Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kryptobesteuern/claude-fuer-krypto-und-steuernWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/kryptobesteuern/claude-fuer-krypto-und-steuern/krypto-aufsichtsrecht-blockchain)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/kryptobesteuern/claude-fuer-krypto-und-steuern/krypto-aufsichtsrecht-blockchain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/kryptobesteuern/claude-fuer-krypto-und-steuern/krypto-aufsichtsrecht-blockchain/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/kryptobesteuern/claude-fuer-krypto-und-steuern/krypto-aufsichtsrecht-blockchain"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/kryptobesteuern/claude-fuer-krypto-und-steuern/krypto-aufsichtsrecht-blockchain.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
krypto-aufsichtsrecht-blockchain scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 8 skills travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 572 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
- Skill bafin-erlaubnispflicht-kryptowerte A 83 tokens
- Skill dao-rechtsform-einordnung A 65 tokens
- Skill smart-contract-haftung-zivilrecht A 71 tokens
- Skill token-klassifizierung-mica A 72 tokens
- Skill wallet-verwahrung-haftungsfragen A 70 tokens
- Skill aml-kyc-kryptodienstleister A 69 tokens
- Skill stablecoin-emittenten-pflichten-mica A 72 tokens
- Skill travel-rule-kryptotransfers A 70 tokens
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines scan A b7e2b7b88f8f
krypto-aufsichtsrecht-blockchain is a plugin published in the GitHub repository kryptobesteuern/claude-fuer-krypto-und-steuern (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other plugins, from other repositories
krypto-mikar
Kryptowerteaufsicht nach der MiCAR (VO (EU) 2023/1114) und dem deutschen Kryptomärkteaufsichtsgesetz (KMAG) – Anwendungsbereich und Tokenklassen (vermögenswertreferenzierte Token, E-Geld-Token, sonstige Kryptowerte) mit den Ausnahmen des Art. 2 Abs. 3, 4 und der Abgrenzung zu KWG, WpIG, KAGB und ZAG…
ccpa
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) compliance advisor — business threshold analysis, consumer rights fulfillment, ADMT opt-out (Jan 2027 deadline), cybersecurity audits and risk assessments (live Jan 2026), enforcement precedents (Disney $2.75M record), privacy notice…
csrd
EU CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, EU 2022/2464) compliance advisor — scope & threshold analysis (large PIEs, other large, listed SMEs, non-EU), double materiality assessment (DMA), ESRS gap assessment, ESRS E1–E5 environmental disclosures, ESRS S1–S4 social disclosures, ESRS G1 governance, Scope…
dpdpa
India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA) and DPDP Rules, 2025 compliance advisor — gap analysis, notice and consent requirements, Data Principal rights, breach notification, children's data, Significant Data Fiduciary obligations, cross-border transfers, Data Protection Board proceedings, and GDPR…
lgpd
Expert LGPD compliance advisor for Brazil's data protection law (Law 13,709/2018). Covers legal bases, data subject rights, ANPD obligations, DPO appointment, breach notification, DPIA, international transfers including Brazil-EU mutual adequacy (January 2026 — no SCCs/BCRs needed for EU transfers), penalties up to 2%.
cmmc
Expert CMMC 2.0 compliance advisor for US defense contractors — gap analysis, SSP drafting, POA&M management, SPRS scoring, CUI scoping, and C3PAO assessment readiness for Level 1, 2, and 3.