Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LaStrada/claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/lastrada/claude/review-with)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/lastrada/claude/review-with"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/lastrada/claude/review-with/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/lastrada/claude/review-with"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/lastrada/claude/review-with.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
review-with scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "review-with",
"description": "Second-opinion code review via external CLIs. Ships a panel skill (review-with-everyone) that fans a single resolved diff out to Gemini, Copilot, and Codex in parallel — with one upload gate, a public-repo gate for Codex, and a synthesized, agreement-sorted report — plus per-tool skills (review-with-gemini / -codex / -copilot) for a single reviewer. Slash commands expose each explicitly (/review-with:super-review, :gemini, :codex, :copilot) with second-opinion and external-review aliases for the panel; natural-language triggers like \"super review\", \"second opinion\", \"external review\", or \"review with gemini\" auto-invoke. Never posts to or resolves PR threads without explicit approval.",
"version": "0.1.0",
"author": {
"name": "Ståle Storø Hauknes",
"url": "https://github.com/LaStrada"
}
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 4 skills, 6 commands travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 839 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
- Skill review-with-everyone A 161 tokens
- Skill review-with-copilot A 196 tokens
- Skill review-with-gemini A 143 tokens
- Skill review-with-codex A 177 tokens
- Command super-review A 29 tokens
- Command codex A 30 tokens
- Command copilot A 24 tokens
- Command external-review A 29 tokens
- Command gemini A 21 tokens
- Command second-opinion A 29 tokens
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 10 lines scan A 9f75a9a7fc6b
review-with is a plugin published in the GitHub repository LaStrada/claude (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other plugins, from other repositories
han-communication
Foundational communication plugin for the Han suite. Owns the canonical readability standard, the writing-voice profile, and the explanation standard for talking to a reader who will not implement the work, plus the readability-guidance skill that surfaces the first two into a calling skill's own context for in-voice…
pedantic-coder
Zero-tolerance code pedantry — naming precision, casing law, structural symmetry, import discipline, and the obsessive details that separate clean code from correct code.
ai-infra-auto-driven-skills
Agent-ready playbooks for LLM serving benchmarks, SGLang model Day-0 support, capacity planning, profiling, code review, incidents, PR-history dossiers, and SGLang PR/article explainer videos.
git-pr
Committing, PR creation and review triage, and dependency upgrades.
code-quality
OxLint, Biome, and Prettier configuration, linting skills, and pre-commit hooks for consistent code quality.
coderabbit
CodeRabbit integration for Claude Code - local code review and PR comment management.