Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LaStrada/claude --skill review-with-everyonegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LaStrada/claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lastrada/claude/review-with-everyone)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lastrada/claude/review-with-everyone"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lastrada/claude/review-with-everyone/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lastrada/claude/review-with-everyone"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lastrada/claude/review-with-everyone.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00161 | $0.01949 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00064 | $0.00780 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00390 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00195 |
Grade A, and why
review-with-everyone scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
review-with-everyone
Orchestrate a multi-reviewer "super review": fan out a single resolved diff to the eligible external review CLIs in parallel, then merge their findings into one prioritized report.
This skill owns roster selection, scope resolution, one up-front gate+confirmation, parallel dispatch, and synthesis. It does NOT re-implement any reviewer's CLI flags, model pins, or repo rules — those live in the per-tool skills and stay there. You delegate execution to review-with-codex, review-with-gemini, and review-with-copilot.
The five steps (in order)
- Resolve scope — what diff are we reviewing?
- Resolve roster + availability preflight — which tools are requested, and which are actually installed?
- Gate + ONE confirmation — sensitive paths, public-repo gate, single upload prompt.
- Dispatch in parallel — one subagent per eligible tool.
- Synthesize — merge into one prioritized report.
1. Resolve scope (dynamic)
Parse the request for the target. Default, if nothing is specified: current branch vs base (BASE..HEAD). Otherwise honor what the user named:
| User says | Scope |
|---|---|
| a PR number / URL, or "this PR" | that PR's diff + fetch existing PR comments once (passed to all tools) |
| a branch name, or nothing | BASE..HEAD (base = git remote show origin | awk '/HEAD branch/{print $NF}') |
| "staged" | git diff --cached |
| "unstaged" / "current changes" / "what I have" | git diff (or git diff HEAD for both staged+unstaged) |
| one or more files | restrict the diff to those paths |
| a commit sha | git show <sha> |
Compute the diff once here. All tools review the exact same payload. Full parsing detail: references/scope-roster.md.
2. Resolve roster + availability preflight (dynamic)
- "super review" / "review with all" / "review with everyone" → all three eligible.
- "review with all gemini and copilot" (or any explicit subset) → only the named tools.
Availability preflight. This skill orchestrates the per-tool skills; it does NOT bundle their CLIs. A tool can run only if its CLI is installed. Check the requested roster:
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 98 lines · 161 tokens per session scan A f277aa357479
review-with-everyone is a skill published in the GitHub repository LaStrada/claude (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 161 tokens to every session and 1,949 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…