Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mgiovani/cc-arsenalWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/mgiovani/cc-arsenal/cc-arsenal-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/mgiovani/cc-arsenal/cc-arsenal-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/mgiovani/cc-arsenal/cc-arsenal-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/mgiovani/cc-arsenal/cc-arsenal-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/mgiovani/cc-arsenal/cc-arsenal-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
cc-arsenal-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "cc-arsenal-review",
"source": "./",
"strict": false,
"description": "Code review and quality skills: code review, security review, dependency audit, and performance analysis",
"version": "6.2.0",
"author": {
"name": "Giovani Moutinho",
"email": "[email protected]",
"url": "https://github.com/mgiovani/cc-arsenal"
},
"homepage": "https://github.com/mgiovani/cc-arsenal",
"repository": "https://github.com/mgiovani/cc-arsenal",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": [
"code-review",
"security",
"performance",
"dependencies",
"quality",
"audit"
],
"category": "development",
"skills": [
"./skills/render/",
"./skills/review-code/",
"./skills/review-deps/",
"./skills/review-design/",
"./skills/review-perf/",
"./skills/review-plan/",
"./skills/review-security/",
"./skills/stopslop/"
]
}What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 8 skills travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 1,146 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What ships with it
2 files beside marketplace.json#cc-arsenal-review in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed 6bca0332ba94
- 21d ago Changed e32b86cfb535
- 22d ago Changed · +1 lines 4bdd50e5c239
- 1mo ago Changed 2514ed3a16e8
- 1mo ago First seen · 33 lines scan A ba82522a9008
cc-arsenal-review is a plugin published in the GitHub repository mgiovani/cc-arsenal (8 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-10.
Other plugins, from other repositories
quality
Code quality skills — refactoring, naming conventions, project structure, and internationalisation.
diffctx
Selects the minimum code an LLM needs to review a git diff.
aigon
aigon. Aigon is a local, open-source, spec-first software-delivery orchestrator for coding agents. It takes a Git-backed feature spec through isolated implementation, cross-agent review, and merge—using the agents and subscriptions you already have.
xonovex-core
Apply software design, testing, review, version control, credentials, and accessibility practices.
heygen
Agent-callable HeyGen tools — generate AI avatar videos, translate and lip-sync videos, synthesize speech, and clone or browse voices and avatars. Use when the user mentions HeyGen or wants to create, translate, or check the status of AI videos, or to generate or clone a voice — including requests that don't name…
humanizer
Rewrite AI-sounding text so it reads like the writer without changing what it says.