Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/alkoleft/mcp-bsl-platform-context/phased-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alkoleft/mcp-bsl-platform-contextWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.04833 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02416 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00967 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00483 |
Grade A, and why
phased-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to phased-implementation — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 655 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PHASED IMPLEMENTATION FOR LEVEL 4 TASKS
TL;DR: This document outlines a structured phased implementation approach for Level 4 (Complex System) tasks, ensuring controlled, incremental delivery of complex systems with appropriate verification at each phase.
🔍 PHASED IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW
Level 4 Complex System tasks require a controlled, incremental approach to implementation to manage complexity, reduce risk, and ensure quality. This document outlines a phased implementation methodology that divides complex system development into discrete, verifiable phases with clear entry and exit criteria.
flowchart TD
classDef phase fill:#f9d77e,stroke:#d9b95c,color:#000
classDef artifact fill:#f4b8c4,stroke:#d498a4,color:#000
classDef verification fill:#c5e8b7,stroke:#a5c897,color:#000
Start([Begin Implementation<br>Process]) --> Framework[Establish Implementation<br>Framework]
Framework --> Plan[Create Phasing<br>Plan]
Plan --> Foundation[Implement<br>Foundation Phase]
Foundation --> VerifyF{Foundation<br>Verification}
VerifyF -->|Pass| Core[Implement<br>Core Phase]
VerifyF -->|Fail| ReviseF[Revise<br>Foundation]
ReviseF --> VerifyF
Core --> VerifyC{Core<br>Verification}
VerifyC -->|Pass| Extension[Implement<br>Extension Phase]
VerifyC -->|Fail| ReviseC[Revise<br>Core]
ReviseC --> VerifyC
Extension --> VerifyE{Extension<br>Verification}
VerifyE -->|Pass| Integration[Implement<br>Integration Phase]
VerifyE -->|Fail| ReviseE[Revise<br>Extension]
ReviseE --> VerifyE
Integration --> VerifyI{Integration<br>Verification}
VerifyI -->|Pass| Finalization[Implement<br>Finalization Phase]
VerifyI -->|Fail| ReviseI[Revise<br>Integration]
ReviseI --> VerifyI
Finalization --> VerifyFin{Finalization<br>Verification}
VerifyFin -->|Pass| Complete([Implementation<br>Complete])
VerifyFin -->|Fail| ReviseFin[Revise<br>Finalization]
ReviseFin --> VerifyFin
Framework -.-> IF((Implementation<br>Framework))
Plan -.-> PP((Phasing<br>Plan))
Foundation -.-> FP((Foundation<br>Phase))
Core -.-> CP((Core<br>Phase))
Extension -.-> EP((Extension<br>Phase))
Integration -.-> IP((Integration<br>Phase))
Finalization -.-> FiP((Finalization<br>Phase))
class Start,Complete milestone
class Framework,Plan,Foundation,Core,Extension,Integration,Finalization,ReviseF,ReviseC,ReviseE,ReviseI,ReviseFin step
class VerifyF,VerifyC,VerifyE,VerifyI,VerifyFin verification
class IF,PP,FP,CP,EP,IP,FiP artifact
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 655 lines · 4,833 tokens per session scan A 4298bb88b5c9
phased-implementation is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository alkoleft/mcp-bsl-platform-context (191 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 4,833 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to phased-implementation, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
111-java-object-oriented-design
Java Object-Oriented Design Guidelines.
131-java-refactoring-with-modern-features
Modern Java Development Guidelines (Java 8+).
115-java-concurrency
Java rules for Concurrency objects.
133-java-data-oriented-programming
Java rules to apply data oriented programming style.
113-java-general-guidelines
This document outlines general Java coding guidelines covering fundamental aspects such as naming conventions for packages, classes, methods, variables, and constants; code formatting rules including indentation, line length, brace style, and whitespace usage; standards for organizing import statements; best practices…
122-java-integration-testing
Java Integration testing guidelines.