Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/alkoleft/platform-context-exporter/122-java-integration-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alkoleft/platform-context-exporterWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.06023 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.03011 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01205 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00602 |
Grade A, and why
122-java-integration-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 586 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Java Integration testing guidelines
These guidelines aim to ensure consistency, reliability, and maintainability of integration tests within the project.
Table of contents
- Rule 1: Define Clear Scope and Purpose for Integration Tests
- Rule 2: Manage Test Environment & Dependencies with Testcontainers
- Rule 3: Utilize RestAssured for Robust API Testing
- Rule 4: Implement Consistent Data Management Strategies
- Rule 5: Maintain Clear Test Structure and Assertions
- Rule 6: Optimize for Performance and Ensure Proper Cleanup
Rule 1: Define Clear Scope and Purpose for Integration Tests
Title: Clearly Define the Scope and Purpose of Each Integration Test Description:
- Integration tests must verify the interaction between multiple components or systems (e.g., service layer with database, service-to-service communication over HTTP).
- Clearly define the boundary of each integration test. What specific interaction, contract, or flow is being tested?
- Prefer integration tests for verifying contracts between services (APIs) and interactions with external dependencies (databases, message queues, etc.).
- Avoid replicating complex business logic in integration tests if it is already thoroughly covered by unit tests. Focus on the integration points.
Good example:
// Assume: ProductService interacts with ProductRepository (database) and NotificationService (external HTTP)
// @SpringBootTest // or similar context for the test
// @Testcontainers // if using Testcontainers
public class ProductServiceIT {
// @Autowired
// private ProductService productService;
// @Autowired
// private ProductRepository productRepository; // To verify DB state
// Mock or use a Testcontainer for NotificationService if its actual calls are out of scope
// @MockBean
// private NotificationService mockNotificationService;
// @Test
void should_createProduct_saveToDatabase_and_sendNotification() {
// Scope: Test the flow of creating a product, ensuring it's saved,
// and that a notification attempt is made.
// Given: A product DTO
// ProductDto newProductDto = new ProductDto("Laptop X1", 1500.00);
// When: ProductService creates the product
// Product createdProduct = productService.createProduct(newProductDto);
// Then: Verify interactions
// 1. Product is saved in the database (verify via repository or direct query)
// Optional<ProductEntity> savedEntity = productRepository.findById(createdProduct.getId());
// assertThat(savedEntity).isPresent();
// assertThat(savedEntity.get().getName()).isEqualTo("Laptop X1");
// 2. Notification service was called (verify via mock or wiremock if testing HTTP contract)
// verify(mockNotificationService).sendProductCreationNotification(any(Product.class));
System.out.println("Conceptual test: Product creation flow verified.");
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 586 lines · 6,023 tokens per session scan A 256a1ac04d24
122-java-integration-testing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository alkoleft/platform-context-exporter (48 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 6,023 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
1c-coding-standards
Стандарты кода BSL: именование, запросы, коллекции.
anti_patterns
Критические антипаттерны 1С: запрос в цикле, реквизиты через точку.
bsl-ssl
Переиспользование БСП, разметка правок типовых модулей, устаревшие объекты.
edt-form-xml-requirements
Требования EDT к XML-формам (Form.form): extInfo, дефолты полей.
sdd-workflow
Specification-Driven Development: 9-фазный workflow разработки.
1c-report-direct-query
Прямой запрос в отчётах 1С (СКД) без схемы компоновки.