Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/andr-ca/agentharnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/andr-ca/agentharness/performance-profiling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/andr-ca/agentharness/performance-profiling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/andr-ca/agentharness/performance-profiling/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/andr-ca/agentharness/performance-profiling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/andr-ca/agentharness/performance-profiling.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.01455 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00582 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00291 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
performance-profiling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 223 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Performance Profiling
A structured approach to diagnosing and fixing performance problems. The workflow is the same across languages; the tools differ.
Rule zero: Profile before optimising. Optimising without data is guessing. Guessing wastes time and often makes things worse.
Workflow
1. Define the problem
Write one sentence: "The GET /users endpoint takes 4s at p95 under
50 concurrent users; the target is < 500ms."
Without a measurable baseline and a concrete target, you won't know if your optimisation worked.
2. Form a hypothesis
Based on the symptoms, guess the likely cause:
- Slow endpoint → database query (N+1, missing index, large result set)?
- High CPU → tight loop, regex, serialisation?
- High memory → unbounded cache, large object held in scope, leak?
- Slow startup → heavy imports, unnecessary initialisation?
3. Profile
Pick the appropriate tool (see below) and run it against your hypothesis. Look at the top 5–10 most expensive functions/frames.
4. Benchmark
Measure before you change anything. Write a reproducible benchmark:
# HTTP endpoint (Apache Bench)
ab -n 1000 -c 50 http://localhost:3000/users
# Or hey (Go-based, better output)
hey -n 1000 -c 50 http://localhost:3000/users
Record p50, p95, p99 and throughput. This is your baseline.
5. Fix and re-benchmark
Make one change at a time. Re-run the benchmark and compare to the baseline. Multiple simultaneous changes make it impossible to know which one helped.
6. Verify under realistic load
Profiling under idle or synthetic load can miss real bottlenecks. Use production-shaped data volumes and concurrency levels.
Python
cProfile (deterministic, low overhead)
import cProfile
cProfile.run('my_function()', sort='cumulative')
Or on the command line:
python -m cProfile -s cumulative my_script.py | head -30
Key columns: tottime (time in this function only) and cumtime
(including all called functions). Focus on functions with high tottime
or unexpectedly high call counts.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 223 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A bc4dd80a16de
performance-profiling is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository andr-ca/agentharness (1 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 1,455 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
root-cause-first
Require source-level fixes for malformed or polluted domain data.
debugging
Debugging discipline. Apply when investigating a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior.
crew
Crew Mate production-change checklist for one failing target.
windsurfrules
This repo has a GraphPilot structural code-graph available via MCP. Use it before grep on structural questions.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.