Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bluewings1211/codebase-RAGWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/bluewings1211/codebase-rag/process-task-list)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/bluewings1211/codebase-rag/process-task-list"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/bluewings1211/codebase-rag/process-task-list/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/bluewings1211/codebase-rag/process-task-list"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/bluewings1211/codebase-rag/process-task-list.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00388 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00155 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
process-task-list scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- process-task-list — 88% identical, 13 lines differ
- 1002-task-list — 88% identical, 23 lines differ
- process-task-list — 83% identical, 21 lines differ
What it actually says
Task List Management
Guidelines for managing task lists in markdown files to track progress on completing a PRD
Task Implementation
- One sub-task at a time: Do NOT start the next sub‑task until you ask the user for permission and they say “yes” or "y"
- if user reply yolo, you Can start next sub-task without permission
- Completion protocol:
- When you finish a sub‑task, immediately mark it as completed by changing
[ ]to[x]. - If all subtasks underneath a parent task are now
[x], also mark the parent task as completed.
- When you finish a sub‑task, immediately mark it as completed by changing
- Stop after each sub‑task and wait for the user’s go‑ahead.
Task List Maintenance
-
Update the task list as you work:
- Mark tasks and subtasks as completed (
[x]) per the protocol above. - Add new tasks as they emerge.
- Mark tasks and subtasks as completed (
-
Maintain the “Relevant Files” section:
- List every file created or modified.
- Give each file a one‑line description of its purpose.
AI Instructions
When working with task lists, the AI must:
- Regularly update the task list file after finishing any significant work.
- Follow the completion protocol:
- Mark each finished sub‑task
[x]. - Mark the parent task
[x]once all its subtasks are[x].
- Mark each finished sub‑task
- Add newly discovered tasks.
- Keep “Relevant Files” accurate and up to date.
- Before starting work, check which sub‑task is next.
- After implementing a sub‑task, update the file , use git as version control and then pause for user approval.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a02d13e870ad
process-task-list is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository bluewings1211/codebase-RAG (15 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 388 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
state-memory-mcp
This project tracks workflow state, tasks, design decisions, and blockers using state-memory-mcp with project slug "state-memory-mcp".
cursor_conductor_task_management
description: Best practices for effective task management with Conductor Tasks in an AI-assisted workflow globs: / alwaysApply: true.
awp-auto
When the user says awp auto, awp auto strict, or runs the Kanban Auto command — enforce the per-task loop (not batch delivery).
task-tracking-basic
Basic task tracking for Level 2 Simple Enhancement tasks.
md-feedback-workflow
This project uses md-feedback for structured human review of implementation plans.
taskmaster
Cursor rule "taskmaster" from zenjoy/realtime-register-mcp, covering taskmaster tool & command reference, initialization & setup, 1. initialize project (init), 2. parse prd (parseprd) and ai model configuration.