Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/compozy/gographWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/compozy/gograph/go-coding-standards)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/compozy/gograph/go-coding-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/compozy/gograph/go-coding-standards/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/compozy/gograph/go-coding-standards"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/compozy/gograph/go-coding-standards.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00844 | $0.00844 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00338 | $0.00338 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00169 | $0.00169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00084 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
go-coding-standards scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Coding Standards
Project Structure and Organization
- Group code by feature/domain when appropriate (agent, task, tool, workflow)
- Keep package names simple and descriptive
- Follow the established pattern of separating interfaces from implementations
Code Style and Standards
<documentation_policy>
- DON'T ADD comments to explain code changes - explanation belongs in text responses
- Only add code comments when user explicitly requests them or code is complex and requires context for future developers </documentation_policy>
Error Handling
<unified_strategy type="mandatory"> UNIFIED ERROR HANDLING STRATEGY - SINGLE SOURCE OF TRUTH
-
Internal Error Propagation (within domains):
- Use
fmt.Errorf()for all internal error propagation within a domain - Always wrap errors with context:
fmt.Errorf("failed to load user: %w", err) - This keeps internal code simple and avoids unnecessary abstraction
- Use
-
Domain Boundaries (public service methods):
- Use
core.NewError()ONLY when returning errors from public service methods - These are the methods exposed to other domains or external consumers
- Provides structured error information for cross-domain communication
- Use
-
Always Required:
- Check and handle errors explicitly - never ignore errors
- Return early on errors to avoid deep nesting
- Avoid naked returns in longer functions (as enforced by nakedret linter) </unified_strategy>
// ✅ DOMAIN BOUNDARY: Use core.NewError for public methods func (s *userService) CreateUser(ctx context.Context, req CreateUserRequest) (*User, error) { user := &User{Email: req.Email, Name: req.Name} if err := s.validateUser(ctx, user); err != nil { return nil, core.NewError(err, "USER_VALIDATION_FAILED", map[string]any{ "email": req.Email, }) } // ... rest of implementation using fmt.Errorf internally }
</examples>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 121 lines · 844 tokens per session scan A 2a988a728d5a
go-coding-standards is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository compozy/gograph (9 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 844 tokens to every session, about $0.0034 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
go-backend-scalability-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Go development with backend scalability.
backend
You are an expert in Go, Gin, Gorm, Gen, Cosy (https://cosy.uozi.org/) with a deep understanding of best practices and performance optimization techniques in these technologies.
go-servemux-rest-api-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Go development with ServeMux REST API integration.
shared-libraries
Shared libraries - condition framework, inventory containers, file-backed DB, itinerary, references.
go-grpc-service-rule
A set of Chinese-language rules for implementing gRPC services in Go. gRPC is a way for software services to communicate using defined messages and procedures.
usecase
Claude Rules - Use Case Pattern.