slice-tasks

slice-tasks is a cursor rule for Cursor from danielvm-git/bigpowers. It costs 59 tokens per session (1,168 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

PLANNING SPINE STEP 2 of 3 — Slice the work: break a scoped PRD into vertical-slice stories in specs/epics/. Use after scope-work (step 1), before plan-work (step 3). Not a substitute for scope-work or plan-work.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/danielvm-git/bigpowers/slice-tasks
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danielvm-git/bigpowers

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for slice-tasks

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/danielvm-git/bigpowers/slice-tasks.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/danielvm-git/bigpowers/slice-tasks)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/danielvm-git/bigpowers/slice-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/danielvm-git/bigpowers/slice-tasks.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 59 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,168 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00059 $0.01168
Opus 5 $0.00030 $0.00584
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00234
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00117

Measured today against content hash 6608f33b25ca, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

slice-tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/slice-tasks.mdc · 68 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

story: e45s29

Slice Tasks

Spine position: Step 2 — scope-work → slice-tasks → plan-work.

Produce epic capsule story tasks in specs/epics/eNN-slug/ — vertical slices, each independently deliverable and testable. Output: decoupled eNNsYY-tasks.yaml files with runnable verify commands. Legacy specs/epics/ (see slice-tasks) is deprecated; use capsule dirs + execution-status.yaml.

Pre-flight

  • Does specs/product/SCOPE_LATEST.yaml exist? If not, run scope-work first — you can't slice what you haven't bounded.
  • Is the release-plan.yaml populated with the epics you're slicing? Epic IDs (e01, e02…) should exist before you create stories.
  • Do you understand the difference between a horizontal layer and a vertical slice? (See anti-patterns below.)

Process

  1. Read planning-context.yaml — If specs/planning-context.yaml exists, read it first:

    test -f specs/planning-context.yaml && echo "Context found" || echo "No context — starting fresh"
    

    Use feature_name, constraints, and out_of_scope to inform slice boundaries. key_decisions in the file may constrain how stories are cut (e.g., "no external deps" constrains slice 2). If absent, proceed normally.

  2. Read context — Read specs/product/SCOPE_LATEST.yaml and/or specs/release-plan.yaml. Understand what the epic delivers end-to-end.

  3. Cut tracer-bullet slices — Identify the thinnest possible vertical path through the stack that delivers user value. Start with this slice; it will catch integration issues first. For example:

    • A search feature: first slice is "user types query → API returns results" (no filters, no pagination, no ranking — just the plumbing working end-to-end).
    • A checkout flow: first slice is "user clicks buy → order created" (no payment, no inventory, no email).
  4. Assign BCPs — For each story, estimate Business Complexity Points (1–13). A 1-BCP story is a trivial change (one file, one concept). A 13-BCP story is a major feature across multiple modules. If a story exceeds 8 BCPs, consider splitting it.

Read the full file on GitHub · 68 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 68 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 6608f33b25ca

Subscribe to this mod's changes

slice-tasks is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository danielvm-git/bigpowers (162 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,168 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.