Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/danielvm-git/bigpowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/danielvm-git/bigpowers/slice-tasks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/danielvm-git/bigpowers/slice-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/danielvm-git/bigpowers/slice-tasks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/danielvm-git/bigpowers/slice-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/danielvm-git/bigpowers/slice-tasks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.01168 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00467 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00234 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
slice-tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
story: e45s29
Slice Tasks
Spine position: Step 2 — scope-work → slice-tasks → plan-work.
Produce epic capsule story tasks in specs/epics/eNN-slug/ — vertical slices, each independently deliverable and testable. Output: decoupled eNNsYY-tasks.yaml files with runnable verify commands. Legacy specs/epics/ (see slice-tasks) is deprecated; use capsule dirs + execution-status.yaml.
Pre-flight
- Does
specs/product/SCOPE_LATEST.yamlexist? If not, runscope-workfirst — you can't slice what you haven't bounded. - Is the
release-plan.yamlpopulated with the epics you're slicing? Epic IDs (e01, e02…) should exist before you create stories. - Do you understand the difference between a horizontal layer and a vertical slice? (See anti-patterns below.)
Process
-
Read planning-context.yaml — If
specs/planning-context.yamlexists, read it first:test -f specs/planning-context.yaml && echo "Context found" || echo "No context — starting fresh"Use
feature_name,constraints, andout_of_scopeto inform slice boundaries.key_decisionsin the file may constrain how stories are cut (e.g., "no external deps" constrains slice 2). If absent, proceed normally. -
Read context — Read
specs/product/SCOPE_LATEST.yamland/orspecs/release-plan.yaml. Understand what the epic delivers end-to-end. -
Cut tracer-bullet slices — Identify the thinnest possible vertical path through the stack that delivers user value. Start with this slice; it will catch integration issues first. For example:
- A search feature: first slice is "user types query → API returns results" (no filters, no pagination, no ranking — just the plumbing working end-to-end).
- A checkout flow: first slice is "user clicks buy → order created" (no payment, no inventory, no email).
-
Assign BCPs — For each story, estimate Business Complexity Points (1–13). A 1-BCP story is a trivial change (one file, one concept). A 13-BCP story is a major feature across multiple modules. If a story exceeds 8 BCPs, consider splitting it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 68 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 6608f33b25ca
slice-tasks is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository danielvm-git/bigpowers (267 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,168 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
payload-cms
Payload CMS: collections, fields, hooks, access control, admin UI.
monorepo
Monorepo: workspace references, shared packages, boundaries.
pnpm
PNPM: workspace monorepos, efficient package management.
ai-dev-os-ticket
Generates a ticket (local file or GitHub Issue) with implementation summary and checklist candidates derived from AI Dev OS guidelines. Used to create structured implementation tasks.
agent-workflow-orchestration
Mandatory PM-orchestrated subagent workflow — main agent is manager, no separate PM subagent.
12-new-project
Workflow for starting a new app from this template - rebranding, identity, cleanup and first feature.