Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/dasomel/oh-my-cursor/tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dasomel/oh-my-cursorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/dasomel/oh-my-cursor/tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/dasomel/oh-my-cursor/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/dasomel/oh-my-cursor/tdd.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00431 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00216 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
TDD Workflow
Trigger Conditions
Activate when user says: "tdd", "test first", "red green", "test-driven"
The Cycle
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ RED PHASE │
│ Write a failing test │
│ Run test → MUST fail │
│ If it passes: test is wrong │
└──────────────┬──────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ GREEN PHASE │
│ Write MINIMUM code to pass │
│ No extra features │
│ Run test → MUST pass │
└──────────────┬──────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ REFACTOR PHASE │
│ Improve code quality │
│ No behavior changes │
│ Run test → MUST still pass │
└──────────────┘
Rules
- Never write production code without a failing test first
- Write only enough test to fail (one assertion at a time)
- Write only enough code to pass the failing test
- Refactor only on green (passing tests)
- One failing test at a time
Test Naming Convention
describe('ComponentName', () => {
describe('methodName', () => {
it('should {behavior} when {condition}', () => {})
it('should throw {error} when {invalid condition}', () => {})
})
})
Switching to Implementation
After RED phase — announce before writing production code: "RED confirmed (test fails). Switching to GREEN phase."
After GREEN phase — announce before refactoring: "GREEN confirmed (test passes). Switching to REFACTOR phase."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 61 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 5091847c0dcd
tdd is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository dasomel/oh-my-cursor (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 431 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
unit-tests-tdd
TDD required for behavior changes; ≥80% package coverage on touched packages; unit-test conventions.
tdd
Final Verification: Always use: go test -v ./backend/api/handler/... | grep FAIL.
workflow
BDD-style workflow, UI screenshots in the PR, HTTP OpenAPI and config schema sync before lint, final checks.
agent-routing.pi-input-intercept
Codex 模型經 Pi machine dispatch 提出問題時的攔截、評估、代答或升級 protocol;觸及 spectra change / screenshot 情境時 path-scoped 載入.
mcpnuke-tests
Test conventions for mcpnuke — enforces TDD workflow.
testing-discipline
TDD, BDD, and testing best practices — stack-agnostic.