development_workflow

development_workflow is a cursor rule for Cursor from ethpandaops/spamoor. It costs 7 tokens per session (967 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of development rules for Spamoor, a Go tool that sends Ethereum transactions for testing. It documents build commands, local development, tests, documentation, and Git conventions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when setting up Spamoor, compiling its binaries, generating API documentation, running tests, using a local Ethereum test network, or preparing changes.
Why use it?
It gives contributors one reference for building and testing the project. It reduces uncertainty about required settings and the expected development workflow.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/.

Needs its repository: it runs a file that does not travel with it, so clone the repository first. The line is go test ./scenarios/eoatx.

Good fit Use it when setting up Spamoor, compiling its binaries, generating API documentation, running tests, using a local Ethereum test network, or preparing changes.

Compare 6 cursor rules from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ethpandaops/spamoor
agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/ethpandaops/spamoor/development_workflow

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for development_workflow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ethpandaops/spamoor/development_workflow/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/rules/ethpandaops/spamoor/development_workflow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ethpandaops/spamoor/development_workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ethpandaops/spamoor/development_workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for development_workflow

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ethpandaops/spamoor/development_workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ethpandaops/spamoor/development_workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 7 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 967 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00007 $0.00967
Opus 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00387
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00001 $0.00193
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00097

Measured 1mo ago against content hash aaef510c2d84, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

development_workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/development_workflow.mdc · 178 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 178 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Spamoor Development Workflow

Build System

Makefile Targets

  • make all: Build documentation and binaries
  • make build: Build binaries with optimizations
  • make build-lib: Build using library mode (without replace directive)
  • make docs: Generate Swagger API documentation
  • make test: Run all tests
  • make clean: Clean build artifacts

Build Configuration

  • CGO_ENABLED=1: Required for SQLite and cryptographic operations
  • Build tags: Use with_blob_v1,ckzg for blob transaction support
  • Optimization flags: -s -w for stripped binaries
  • Version injection: Git commit hash and build time embedded

Development Environment

Local Development

# Standard development setup
git clone https://github.com/ethpandaops/spamoor.git
cd spamoor
make all

# Run tests
make test

# Generate documentation
make docs

DevNet Testing

# Start local devnet
make devnet

# Run spamoor against devnet
make devnet-run

# Clean up devnet
make devnet-clean

Git Workflow

Branch Strategy

  • master: Main development branch
  • feature/*: New features and enhancements
  • fix/*: Bug fixes
  • docs/*: Documentation updates

Commit Standards

  • Use conventional commit format: type(scope): description
  • Types: feat, fix, docs, refactor, test, chore
  • Include issue references when applicable
  • Keep commits atomic and focused

Pull Request Process

  1. Create feature branch from master
  2. Implement changes with tests
  3. Update documentation if needed
  4. Ensure all tests pass
  5. Submit PR with clear description
  6. Address review feedback
  7. Squash and merge when approved

Testing Strategy

Unit Testing

  • Test individual functions and methods
  • Mock external dependencies (RPC clients, databases)
  • Use table-driven tests for multiple scenarios
  • Aim for good coverage of business logic

Integration Testing

  • Test complete scenarios end-to-end
  • Use local devnet for blockchain interactions
  • Verify transaction generation and submission
  • Test daemon API endpoints

Read the full file on GitHub · 178 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 178 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A aaef510c2d84

Subscribe to this mod's changes

development_workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository ethpandaops/spamoor (80 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 967 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.