Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hiromaily/go-crypto-walletWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet/internal-interface)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet/internal-interface"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet/internal-interface/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet/internal-interface"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet/internal-interface.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01462 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00585 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00292 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00146 |
Grade A, and why
internal-interface scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Interface Definition Rules for internal/
Overview
Rules for defining and using interfaces inside the internal/ directory.
These rules enforce the Interface Segregation Principle (ISP) throughout the codebase.
Core Principles
Interfaces are defined where they are used, not where they are implemented.
The application/ports layer owns all interface definitions.
The infrastructure layer contains only concrete implementations — never interface definitions.
Depend only on the methods you actually call. Use cases and adapters must declare only the interface surface they need — never a broader one.
Rules
0. Interface Ownership: application/ports Defines, infrastructure Implements
All interfaces for external dependencies (blockchain APIs, repositories, file storage) MUST be defined in internal/application/ports/.
The infrastructure/ layer MUST NOT define any interfaces — only concrete structs that implement them.
internal/application/ports/api/btc/interface.go ← interface definitions live here
internal/infrastructure/api/btc/bitcoin.go ← concrete implementation only
// ❌ BAD: interface defined in infrastructure layer
// internal/infrastructure/api/btc/bitcoin.go
type BitcoinAPI interface {
GetBalance() (float64, error)
}
// ✅ GOOD: interface defined in application/ports, infrastructure only implements
// internal/application/ports/api/btc/interface.go
type BalanceChecker interface {
GetBalance() (btcutil.Amount, error)
}
// internal/infrastructure/api/btc/bitcoin.go
type Bitcoin struct { ... }
func (b *Bitcoin) GetBalance() (btcutil.Amount, error) { ... } // implements BalanceChecker
1. Never Use Bitcoiner or BCHer Directly
apibtc.Bitcoiner and apibtc.BCHer are legacy monolithic interfaces.
They must NEVER appear as parameters or field types in use cases or adapters.
// ❌ BAD: depends on the full monolithic interface
type myUseCase struct {
btc apibtc.Bitcoiner
}
// ✅ GOOD: depends on only what is needed
type myUseCase struct {
btc apibtc.MultisigManager
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 186 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A cf4f4b5ab4f1
internal-interface is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository hiromaily/go-crypto-wallet (128 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,462 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
go-backend-scalability-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for Go development with backend scalability.
backend
You are an expert in Go, Gin, Gorm, Gen, Cosy (https://cosy.uozi.org/) with a deep understanding of best practices and performance optimization techniques in these technologies.
development_workflow
Spamoor Development Workflow and Best Practices.
go-temporal-dsl-prompt-file
description: "Cursor rules for Go development with Temporal DSL integration." globs: / alwaysApply: false.
workflow
This file provides rules and context for generating or understanding Go code related to a custom Domain Specific Language (DSL) for defining Temporal workflows within this project.
go-api-development-general-rules
General rules for Go API development using the net/http package, focusing on code quality, security, and best practices.