Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/evcraddock/mealplan-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/evcraddock/mealplan-mcp/github-issue-formatting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/evcraddock/mealplan-mcp/github-issue-formatting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/evcraddock/mealplan-mcp/github-issue-formatting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/evcraddock/mealplan-mcp/github-issue-formatting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/evcraddock/mealplan-mcp/github-issue-formatting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00715 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00286 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00143 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00072 |
Grade A, and why
github-issue-formatting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
description: Best practices for creating well-formatted GitHub issues via CLI globs: [] alwaysApply: false
GitHub Issue Formatting Best Practices
When creating or editing GitHub issues via CLI using gh issue create or gh issue edit, follow these formatting guidelines to ensure professional, readable issues:
Issue Structure Template
Every GitHub issue should follow this structure:
## Problem
Clear, concise description of the current issue or limitation.
## Proposed Solution
Detailed explanation of what you want to implement or change.
### Implementation Details
- Specific technical requirements
- File locations that need changes
- Architecture considerations
## Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Specific, testable requirements using checkboxes
- [ ] Clear success metrics
- [ ] Edge cases to consider
## Benefits
- Clear value proposition
- Impact on users/developers
- Long-term advantages
CLI Best Practices
Use Body Files for Complex Issues
- NEVER include newlines in command line arguments
- Create temporary files for issue bodies:
/tmp/issue_body.md - Use
--body-fileflag instead of--bodyfor multi-line content
# ✅ Correct approach
gh issue create --title "Feature Title" --body-file /tmp/issue_body.md --label enhancement
# ❌ Wrong approach - will fail
gh issue create --title "Title" --body "Line 1
Line 2"
Markdown Formatting Rules
- Use clean markdown without raw syntax or excessive escaping
- Structure with proper headings (
##,###) - Use bulleted lists with
-for readability - Include checkboxes for actionable items:
- [ ] - Code references use backticks:
`function_name` - File paths use backticks:
`path/to/file.py`
Content Guidelines
- Be specific: Include exact file paths, function names, and technical details
- Use sections: Break content into logical sections with headings
- Include context: Explain current behavior vs desired behavior
- Add examples: Show before/after code snippets when relevant
- List benefits: Explain why this change matters
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b5b69da013b1
github-issue-formatting is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository evcraddock/mealplan-mcp (2 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 715 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
slice-tasks
PLANNING SPINE STEP 2 of 3 — Slice the work: break a scoped PRD into vertical-slice stories in specs/epics/. Use after scope-work (step 1), before plan-work (step 3). Not a substitute for scope-work or plan-work.
iris
GitHub operations specialist — branches, pull requests, issues, releases, tags. Called by zeus after review. Never pushes or merges without explicit human approval. Integrates with VS Code GitHub Pull Requests extension.
elite-orchestrator
Elite orchestrator for mission-critical, enterprise-scale tasks requiring strategic coordination of 7+ agents across all domains. Makes architectural decisions, manages risk, ensures business continuity, and delivers enterprise-grade outcomes. Use for platform migrations, security incidents, multi-system integrations…
project-onboarding-rule
Automatically onboards existing projects into the AI-driven development workflow.
linear-in-review
After finishing a Linear issue, set its status to In Review (never Done).
sprint-planning
BMAD BMM Agent: sprint-planning.