Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FeatureFactory-io/mimirWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/featurefactory-io/mimir/do-validate-api-contracts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/featurefactory-io/mimir/do-validate-api-contracts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/featurefactory-io/mimir/do-validate-api-contracts/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/featurefactory-io/mimir/do-validate-api-contracts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/featurefactory-io/mimir/do-validate-api-contracts.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00588 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00235 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
do-validate-api-contracts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Requirements
1. Frontend Interface Validation
- Always define TypeScript interfaces that match exact backend response structure
- Include ALL fields returned by backend, including nested objects and metadata
- Validate both success and error response formats
- Example:
// ❌ WRONG - Missing authentication fields
interface UserResponse {
id: number;
username: string;
email: string;
}
// ✅ CORRECT - Matches backend response exactly
interface UserResponse {
user: {
id: number;
username: string;
email: string;
first_name?: string;
last_name?: string;
// ... all user fields
};
authenticated: boolean;
token_valid: boolean;
token_expires_at?: string;
}
2. Response Validation Logic
- Never assume HTTP 200 means success - always check response data fields
- Validate authentication/authorization flags in response
- Handle nested response structures correctly
- Example:
// ❌ WRONG - Only checking HTTP status
if (response.status === 200 && response.data) {
setUser(response.data); // Assumes flat structure
}
// ✅ CORRECT - Full validation with nested structure
if (response.status === 200 && response.data &&
response.data.authenticated && response.data.token_valid) {
setUser(response.data.user); // Correctly accessing nested user
}
3. Documentation Requirements
- Document exact API response formats in Architecture_FULL.md
- Include example JSON responses for all authentication endpoints
- Specify frontend validation requirements
- Update documentation when API contracts change
4. Testing Requirements
- Write integration tests that validate actual API responses
- Test both success and failure scenarios
- Verify frontend handles all response fields correctly
- Include API contract tests in continuous testing
Prevention Checklist
Before implementing frontend API calls:
- Check Architecture_FULL.md for documented response format
- Define TypeScript interface matching exact backend response
- Implement full response validation (not just HTTP status)
- Test with actual backend responses
- Update documentation if response format differs
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 88 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 23bc51f2d597
do-validate-api-contracts is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository FeatureFactory-io/mimir (16 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 588 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
api-property-optionality-hygiene
Fix ApiProperty/ApiPropertyOptional optionality mismatches in DTO files; use for scheduled batch fixes or DTO edits.
python
Python best practices and patterns for modern software development with Flask and SQLite.
cursor
You are working on the checkout service. Preserve transaction integrity and auditability.
django
Definitive guidelines for writing maintainable, performant, and secure Django applications, emphasizing modern best practices, clear code organization, and efficient patterns.
shared-libraries
Shared libraries - condition framework, inventory containers, file-backed DB, itinerary, references.
selectools-providers
Rules for working with LLM provider adapters in selectools.