Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/featurefactory-io/mimir/do-validate-api-contractsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FeatureFactory-io/mimirWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00588 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00294 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
do-validate-api-contracts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Requirements
1. Frontend Interface Validation
- Always define TypeScript interfaces that match exact backend response structure
- Include ALL fields returned by backend, including nested objects and metadata
- Validate both success and error response formats
- Example:
// ❌ WRONG - Missing authentication fields
interface UserResponse {
id: number;
username: string;
email: string;
}
// ✅ CORRECT - Matches backend response exactly
interface UserResponse {
user: {
id: number;
username: string;
email: string;
first_name?: string;
last_name?: string;
// ... all user fields
};
authenticated: boolean;
token_valid: boolean;
token_expires_at?: string;
}
2. Response Validation Logic
- Never assume HTTP 200 means success - always check response data fields
- Validate authentication/authorization flags in response
- Handle nested response structures correctly
- Example:
// ❌ WRONG - Only checking HTTP status
if (response.status === 200 && response.data) {
setUser(response.data); // Assumes flat structure
}
// ✅ CORRECT - Full validation with nested structure
if (response.status === 200 && response.data &&
response.data.authenticated && response.data.token_valid) {
setUser(response.data.user); // Correctly accessing nested user
}
3. Documentation Requirements
- Document exact API response formats in Architecture_FULL.md
- Include example JSON responses for all authentication endpoints
- Specify frontend validation requirements
- Update documentation when API contracts change
4. Testing Requirements
- Write integration tests that validate actual API responses
- Test both success and failure scenarios
- Verify frontend handles all response fields correctly
- Include API contract tests in continuous testing
Prevention Checklist
Before implementing frontend API calls:
- Check Architecture_FULL.md for documented response format
- Define TypeScript interface matching exact backend response
- Implement full response validation (not just HTTP status)
- Test with actual backend responses
- Update documentation if response format differs
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 88 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 23bc51f2d597
do-validate-api-contracts is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository FeatureFactory-io/mimir (13 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 588 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
typescript
Changes to these high-fan-out internals can affect every message, delta, element, or rerun. Keep work in them minimal, and benchmark changes with representative stress-test apps.
coolify-ai-docs
Master reference to all Coolify AI documentation in .ai/ directory.
python_lib
Tips and guidelines specific to the development of the Streamlit Python library, not applicable to scripts and e2e tests.
specs
This directory contains product and tech specs for Streamlit features.