do-validate-api-contracts

A coding rule for keeping TypeScript data shapes identical to the responses returned by an API, including nested data, authentication details, and errors.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when defining frontend interfaces and checking API responses, especially for login, permissions, tokens, and nested response objects.
Why use it?
It prevents code from treating incomplete or incorrectly shaped API data as valid. It also avoids assuming that an HTTP 200 response always means the operation succeeded.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/featurefactory-io/mimir/do-validate-api-contracts
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FeatureFactory-io/mimir

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 0 Nothing until a file matches its globs; then the whole rule loads.
When invoked 588 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00588
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00294
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00118
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00059

Measured 2d ago against content hash 23bc51f2d597, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

do-validate-api-contracts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/do-validate-api-contracts.mdc · 88 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Requirements

1. Frontend Interface Validation

  • Always define TypeScript interfaces that match exact backend response structure
  • Include ALL fields returned by backend, including nested objects and metadata
  • Validate both success and error response formats
  • Example:
// ❌ WRONG - Missing authentication fields
interface UserResponse {
  id: number;
  username: string;
  email: string;
}

// ✅ CORRECT - Matches backend response exactly
interface UserResponse {
  user: {
    id: number;
    username: string;
    email: string;
    first_name?: string;
    last_name?: string;
    // ... all user fields
  };
  authenticated: boolean;
  token_valid: boolean;
  token_expires_at?: string;
}

2. Response Validation Logic

  • Never assume HTTP 200 means success - always check response data fields
  • Validate authentication/authorization flags in response
  • Handle nested response structures correctly
  • Example:
// ❌ WRONG - Only checking HTTP status
if (response.status === 200 && response.data) {
  setUser(response.data); // Assumes flat structure
}

// ✅ CORRECT - Full validation with nested structure
if (response.status === 200 && response.data && 
    response.data.authenticated && response.data.token_valid) {
  setUser(response.data.user); // Correctly accessing nested user
}

3. Documentation Requirements

  • Document exact API response formats in Architecture_FULL.md
  • Include example JSON responses for all authentication endpoints
  • Specify frontend validation requirements
  • Update documentation when API contracts change

4. Testing Requirements

  • Write integration tests that validate actual API responses
  • Test both success and failure scenarios
  • Verify frontend handles all response fields correctly
  • Include API contract tests in continuous testing

Prevention Checklist

Before implementing frontend API calls:

  • Check Architecture_FULL.md for documented response format
  • Define TypeScript interface matching exact backend response
  • Implement full response validation (not just HTTP status)
  • Test with actual backend responses
  • Update documentation if response format differs

Read the full file on GitHub · 88 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 88 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 23bc51f2d597

Subscribe to this mod's changes

do-validate-api-contracts is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository FeatureFactory-io/mimir (13 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 588 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.