Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Hansonli05/Cursor-rules-systemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/hansonli05/cursor-rules-system/progress)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/hansonli05/cursor-rules-system/progress"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/hansonli05/cursor-rules-system/progress/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/hansonli05/cursor-rules-system/progress"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/hansonli05/cursor-rules-system/progress.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.01351 | $0.01351 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00540 | $0.00540 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00270 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00135 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
progress scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Progress
Project Status Overview
[GOAL] Current Phase: [Phase name and overall objective] [TECH] Technology Maturity: [How stable is the current tech stack] [TEAM] Team Status: [Team size, roles, availability]
[COMPLETE] Features & Components
Core Infrastructure
- [COMPLETE] [Infrastructure Item 1] - [Brief description]
- [COMPLETE] [Infrastructure Item 2] - [Brief description]
User Features
- [COMPLETE] [Feature 1] - [Description, completion date]
- [COMPLETE] [Feature 2] - [Description, completion date]
Technical Features
- [COMPLETE] [Technical Feature 1] - [Description, completion date]
- [COMPLETE] [Technical Feature 2] - [Description, completion date]
[IN_PROGRESS] Current Work
Active Development
-
[IN_PROGRESS] [Feature/Task 1] - [Current status, blocker if any]
- Progress: [Percentage or milestone]
- Next Steps: [Immediate next actions]
- ETA: [Expected completion]
-
[IN_PROGRESS] [Feature/Task 2] - [Current status, blocker if any]
- Progress: [Percentage or milestone]
- Next Steps: [Immediate next actions]
- ETA: [Expected completion]
Under Review
- [TESTING] [Item 1] - [What's being tested or reviewed]
- [TESTING] [Item 2] - [What's being tested or reviewed]
[PENDING] Planned Work
Next Sprint/Phase
- [READY] [Planned Item 1] - [Description and priority]
- [READY] [Planned Item 2] - [Description and priority]
Backlog (Prioritized)
- [PRIORITY] [High Priority Item] - [Description and why it's important]
- [Medium Priority Item] - [Description]
- [Lower Priority Item] - [Description]
[BLOCKED] Blocked Items
-
[BLOCKED] [Blocked Item 1] - [Description]
- Blocker: [What's blocking this]
- Owner: [Who can unblock this]
- Impact: [What this affects]
-
[BLOCKED] [Blocked Item 2] - [Description]
- Blocker: [What's blocking this]
- Owner: [Who can unblock this]
- Impact: [What this affects]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 143 lines · 1,351 tokens per session scan A 62daeddf94e5
progress is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Hansonli05/Cursor-rules-system (2 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,351 tokens to every session, about $0.0054 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
slice-tasks
PLANNING SPINE STEP 2 of 3 — Slice the work: break a scoped PRD into vertical-slice stories in specs/epics/. Use after scope-work (step 1), before plan-work (step 3). Not a substitute for scope-work or plan-work.
iris
GitHub operations specialist — branches, pull requests, issues, releases, tags. Called by zeus after review. Never pushes or merges without explicit human approval. Integrates with VS Code GitHub Pull Requests extension.
elite-orchestrator
Elite orchestrator for mission-critical, enterprise-scale tasks requiring strategic coordination of 7+ agents across all domains. Makes architectural decisions, manages risk, ensures business continuity, and delivers enterprise-grade outcomes. Use for platform migrations, security incidents, multi-system integrations…
project-onboarding-rule
Automatically onboards existing projects into the AI-driven development workflow.
linear-in-review
After finishing a Linear issue, set its status to In Review (never Done).
sprint-planning
BMAD BMM Agent: sprint-planning.