Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hiromaily/docs-ssotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/hiromaily/docs-ssot/git)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/hiromaily/docs-ssot/git"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/hiromaily/docs-ssot/git/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/hiromaily/docs-ssot/git"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/hiromaily/docs-ssot/git.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00779 | $0.00779 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00312 | $0.00312 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00156 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00078 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
git scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Git Practices
Branch rules
- Never commit directly to
main. All changes must go on a feature branch and be merged via PR. If you realise you are onmainwith uncommitted changes, stash them, create a branch, then pop:git stash git checkout -b feature/your-branch-name git stash pop - Before creating a branch, sync
mainfirst.
Branching from a stalegit checkout main git pull --rebase git checkout -b feature/your-branch-namemaincauses the new branch to miss upstream commits, leading to conflicts and missing content when rebasing later.
Branch naming
Use the prefix that matches the change type:
| Prefix | When to use |
|---|---|
feature/ |
New capability or behaviour |
fix/ |
Bug fix |
refactor/ |
Code restructuring without behaviour change |
chore/ |
Maintenance, dependency updates, config |
docs/ |
Documentation only |
Example: feature/human-interaction-points, fix/jq-precedence-bug
Commit messages
This repository uses Conventional Commits:
<type>(<optional scope>): <short summary>
Recognised types: feat, fix, refactor, perf, test, docs, chore
Examples from this repo:
feat(skill): add effort-aware flow template selectionfix(pre-tool-hook): correct jq precedence in skippedPhases checkperf(pre-tool-hook): combine dual jq calls into single invocationschore: forge artifacts for refactor-scripts-maintainability
Resolving merge conflicts
- Check
git statusbefore any commit or branch operation. Unmerged paths block rebases and cause misleading errors. - Never commit to
mainto resolve a conflict mid-pull. Ifgit pullfails with conflicts, resolve them, then complete the merge withgit commit— do not create new commits on top before the merge is finished. - Keep the more complete/advanced version when resolving state.json conflicts. Pipeline state files (
state.json) record progression; always keep the version with more completed phases.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 779 tokens per session scan A 090f6d07b236
git is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository hiromaily/docs-ssot (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 779 tokens to every session, about $0.0031 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
rebase-only-merged-agents
When rebasing after a merge, only rebase the agents whose branches you just merged. Do not rebase agents that are still running.
iris
GitHub operations specialist — branches, pull requests, issues, releases, tags. Called by zeus after review. Never pushes or merges without explicit human approval. Integrates with VS Code GitHub Pull Requests extension.
git-workflow
Rules for git operations, commit strategy, and GitHub CLI usage.
release-checklist
What to update with each code change or version release.
git-workflow
Git commit format and PR process - conventional commits.
branching-merging-strategy
This is a set of instructions to the AI Assistant for branching and merging strategy.