Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/scoring-and-ranking-rules)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/scoring-and-ranking-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/scoring-and-ranking-rules/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/scoring-and-ranking-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh/scoring-and-ranking-rules.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.00086 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.00034 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00017 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
scoring-and-ranking-rules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
- 游戏完成后对选择进行评分。
- 获胜：条目进入下一周。
- 失败：条目从池中被淘汰。
- 每个条目在池排名中单独排名。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 9 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 70542d182761
scoring-and-ranking-rules is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository holtwood/awesome-cursorrules-zh (239 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ascii-simulation-game-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for ASCII simulation game development.
gamemaker-gml
GameMaker Language (GML) rules for scripts, objects, events, rooms, data structures, and performance-minded game code.
dragonruby-best-practices-cursorrules-prompt-file
Cursor rules for DragonRuby development with best practices integration.
creating-cursor-rules
Meta-rule for creating effective Cursor IDE rules with best practices, patterns, and examples.
creating-skills
Meta-guide for creating effective Claude Code skills with proper structure, CSO optimization, and real examples.
army-and-battle-mechanics-rule
Governs the mechanics related to armies, battles, and territorial control. This rule focuses on combat, resource management, and strategic expansion within the game.