Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulator/01-task-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulator/01-task-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulator/01-task-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulator/01-task-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulator/01-task-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00789 | $0.00789 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00394 | $0.00394 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00158 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00079 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
01-task-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Todo Structure: { "id": "unique-identifier", "content": "specific task description", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "priority": "high|medium|low" }
Visual Display Format:
Display complete todo list after every operation:
Current todos:
✅ Research existing patterns (completed)
🔄 Implement login form (in_progress)
⏳ Add validation (pending)
⏳ Write tests (pending)
Icons: ✅ = completed, 🔄 = in_progress, ⏳ = pending
"Fix performance issues":
- Profile current performance bottlenecks
- Analyze database query patterns
- Implement query optimizations
- Add caching layer
- Optimize frontend bundle size
- Run performance benchmarks
- Document performance improvements
NEVER do "preliminary investigation" outside todos: ❌ "I'll check what libraries you're using..." → starts searching ✅ Create todo: "Audit current dependencies and libraries" → track it
NEVER think through solutions without tracking: ❌ "I need to figure out the best approach..." → starts thinking ✅ Create todo: "Research and design authentication approach" → track it
NEVER side-quest during tasks: ❌ While implementing login, discover bug → fix bug immediately ✅ Stop, create new todo "Fix discovered bug in UserService", continue login
Standard Anti-Patterns:
- Don't batch status updates - Update immediately
- Don't create vague tasks - "Fix stuff" → "Fix null pointer in UserService.validate()"
- Don't skip todo creation for complex tasks to "save time"
- Don't mark incomplete work as completed
- Don't have multiple tasks "in_progress"
- Don't create todos for trivial single-step tasks
- NEVER skip TodoRead() at conversation start
- NEVER update todos without showing visual status
- NEVER work on tasks without marking them in_progress first
Correct approach: CREATE TODO FIRST, then investigate
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 105 lines · 789 tokens per session scan A 805f35338d0a
01-task-management is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulator (26 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 789 tokens to every session, about $0.0039 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
slice-tasks
PLANNING SPINE STEP 2 of 3 — Slice the work: break a scoped PRD into vertical-slice stories in specs/epics/. Use after scope-work (step 1), before plan-work (step 3). Not a substitute for scope-work or plan-work.
iris
GitHub operations specialist — branches, pull requests, issues, releases, tags. Called by zeus after review. Never pushes or merges without explicit human approval. Integrates with VS Code GitHub Pull Requests extension.
elite-orchestrator
Elite orchestrator for mission-critical, enterprise-scale tasks requiring strategic coordination of 7+ agents across all domains. Makes architectural decisions, manages risk, ensures business continuity, and delivers enterprise-grade outcomes. Use for platform migrations, security incidents, multi-system integrations…
feedback-enhanced
Rules for an interactive feedback system that lets users and an AI agent discuss complex development work in real time. It includes guidance for recording decisions, tracking progress and handling detailed inputs such as code and diagrams.
project-onboarding-rule
Automatically onboards existing projects into the AI-driven development workflow.
linear-in-review
After finishing a Linear issue, set its status to In Review (never Done).