Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulator/01-task-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulator/01-task-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulator/01-task-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulator/01-task-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulator/01-task-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00789 | $0.00789 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00316 | $0.00316 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00158 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00079 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
01-task-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Todo Structure: { "id": "unique-identifier", "content": "specific task description", "status": "pending|in_progress|completed", "priority": "high|medium|low" }
Visual Display Format:
Display complete todo list after every operation:
Current todos:
✅ Research existing patterns (completed)
🔄 Implement login form (in_progress)
⏳ Add validation (pending)
⏳ Write tests (pending)
Icons: ✅ = completed, 🔄 = in_progress, ⏳ = pending
"Fix performance issues":
- Profile current performance bottlenecks
- Analyze database query patterns
- Implement query optimizations
- Add caching layer
- Optimize frontend bundle size
- Run performance benchmarks
- Document performance improvements
NEVER do "preliminary investigation" outside todos: ❌ "I'll check what libraries you're using..." → starts searching ✅ Create todo: "Audit current dependencies and libraries" → track it
NEVER think through solutions without tracking: ❌ "I need to figure out the best approach..." → starts thinking ✅ Create todo: "Research and design authentication approach" → track it
NEVER side-quest during tasks: ❌ While implementing login, discover bug → fix bug immediately ✅ Stop, create new todo "Fix discovered bug in UserService", continue login
Standard Anti-Patterns:
- Don't batch status updates - Update immediately
- Don't create vague tasks - "Fix stuff" → "Fix null pointer in UserService.validate()"
- Don't skip todo creation for complex tasks to "save time"
- Don't mark incomplete work as completed
- Don't have multiple tasks "in_progress"
- Don't create todos for trivial single-step tasks
- NEVER skip TodoRead() at conversation start
- NEVER update todos without showing visual status
- NEVER work on tasks without marking them in_progress first
Correct approach: CREATE TODO FIRST, then investigate
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 105 lines · 789 tokens per session scan A 805f35338d0a
01-task-management is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository joehaddad2000/claude-todo-emulator (26 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 789 tokens to every session, about $0.0032 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
slice-tasks
PLANNING SPINE STEP 2 of 3 — Slice the work: break a scoped PRD into vertical-slice stories in specs/epics/. Use after scope-work (step 1), before plan-work (step 3). Not a substitute for scope-work or plan-work.
iris
GitHub operations specialist — branches, pull requests, issues, releases, tags. Called by zeus after review. Never pushes or merges without explicit human approval. Integrates with VS Code GitHub Pull Requests extension.
elite-orchestrator
Elite orchestrator for mission-critical, enterprise-scale tasks requiring strategic coordination of 7+ agents across all domains. Makes architectural decisions, manages risk, ensures business continuity, and delivers enterprise-grade outcomes. Use for platform migrations, security incidents, multi-system integrations…
project-onboarding-rule
Automatically onboards existing projects into the AI-driven development workflow.
linear-in-review
After finishing a Linear issue, set its status to In Review (never Done).
sprint-planning
BMAD BMM Agent: sprint-planning.