Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jterratsdev/ableton-live-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/jterratsdev/ableton-live-mcp/api-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jterratsdev/ableton-live-mcp/api-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jterratsdev/ableton-live-mcp/api-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/jterratsdev/ableton-live-mcp/api-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/jterratsdev/ableton-live-mcp/api-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00296 | $0.00296 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00118 | $0.00118 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00059 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
api-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
API Design
APIs are product contracts. Design them for clarity, compatibility, safety, and operability before implementation.
Contracts
- Define request, response, error shape, authentication, authorization, pagination, filtering, sorting, and rate limits before coding.
- Use stable field names and explicit types. Avoid ambiguous blobs such as
metadataunless the schema is documented. - Use consistent naming, casing, date formats, IDs, and enum values across endpoints.
- Public API changes require examples for success, validation failure, authorization failure, and unexpected failure.
Compatibility
- Prefer backward-compatible changes: add optional fields before removing or renaming anything.
- Version breaking changes intentionally and document migration steps.
- Do not leak internal models directly as API responses.
- Keep error codes stable even when error messages improve.
Safety
- Use idempotency keys for retryable create, payment, provisioning, email, or side-effecting operations.
- Validate input at the boundary and return user-safe errors.
- Enforce authorization per resource, not just per endpoint.
- Apply rate limits and abuse protection for public or high-cost endpoints.
Testing
- Add contract tests for request/response shape and error cases.
- Add backward-compatibility tests when changing existing APIs.
- Include tests for pagination, filtering, authorization, and idempotency when applicable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 296 tokens per session scan A f53c12590f31
api-design is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository jterratsdev/ableton-live-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 296 tokens to every session, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
api-property-optionality-hygiene
Fix ApiProperty/ApiPropertyOptional optionality mismatches in DTO files; use for scheduled batch fixes or DTO edits.
python
Python best practices and patterns for modern software development with Flask and SQLite.
cursor
You are working on the checkout service. Preserve transaction integrity and auditability.
django
Definitive guidelines for writing maintainable, performant, and secure Django applications, emphasizing modern best practices, clear code organization, and efficient patterns.
selectools-providers
Rules for working with LLM provider adapters in selectools.
ehs-ims-conventions
EHS IMS app — RBAC, data layer, tRPC, migrations, AI boundaries.