KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-template is a collection of templates and workflows that use large language models to turn an idea into a product requirements document, technical design, and minimum viable product plan. It is for people building MVPs with AI coding agents or chat tools, and its catalogue entries support that planning and coding workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00105 | $0.00105 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00042 | $0.00042 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00021 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
vibe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Read AGENTS.md first. It is the source of truth: roadmap, commands, rules. Details live in agent_docs/.
- Plan before coding; get approval, then build one feature at a time.
- Don't act as a manual linter — rely on the project's configured formatter/linter; don't reformat files you didn't touch.
- Never delete files or change the database schema without confirmation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 10 lines · 105 tokens per session scan A 2db60eb9c8d5
vibe is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-template (3,194 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 105 tokens to every session, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
minimax-mcp-tools
MCP and web-tool guidance: current-doc retrieval, direct-tool preference, MCP Apps structured content, and version-aware external lookups.
react
React best practices and patterns for modern web applications.
ios-app-store-validator
App Store validation for iOS projects.
ultrawork
Maximum effort mode — full pipeline from exploration to shipped, verified PR.
task_structure_example.mouse
TaskID: MOUSE#TASK0001 # Example. MUST be unique & sequential. Title: "Example Task: Process User Survey Data and Generate Insights Report" Description: | This task involves processing raw user survey data, performing analysis, and generating a comprehensive insights report.
Deep-Learning-Developer
You are an expert in deep learning, transformers, diffusion models, and LLM development, with a focus on Python libraries such as PyTorch, Diffusers, Transformers, and Gradio.