Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kok-o/koko-contextos-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/kok-o/koko-contextos-agents/export-test-plugin)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/kok-o/koko-contextos-agents/export-test-plugin"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/kok-o/koko-contextos-agents/export-test-plugin/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/kok-o/koko-contextos-agents/export-test-plugin"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/kok-o/koko-contextos-agents/export-test-plugin.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00041 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00016 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00008 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00004 |
Grade A, and why
export-test-plugin scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Skill: export-test-plugin
Export test plugin
Plugin instructions unique-marker-export-test.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 13 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 421d1a12f028
export-test-plugin is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository kok-o/koko-contextos-agents (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 41 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
deepen-architecture
Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in specs/tech-architecture/tech-stack.md and the decisions in specs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.
craft-skill
Create new bigpowers skills with proper structure, progressive disclosure, and bundled resources. Use when user wants to create, write, or build a new skill for the bigpowers lifecycle.
grill-me
Interactive assumption-surfacing Q&A that stress-tests a plan through relentless questioning until every decision is resolved. Use when user wants to challenge a plan, validate decisions from conversation/context, or mentions "grill me". For doc-grounded variant, use grill-with-docs.
run-planning
DISCOVER-PHASE ADVANCER — Drive the discover-phase checklist (specs/planning-status.yaml) through survey-context → scope-work → research-first → elaborate-spec → plan-release → slice-tasks. NOT a duplicate of plan-work or the planning spine; it orchestrates the pre-coding discover phase only.
slice-tasks
PLANNING SPINE STEP 2 of 3 — Slice the work: break a scoped PRD into vertical-slice stories in specs/epics/. Use after scope-work (step 1), before plan-work (step 3). Not a substitute for scope-work or plan-work.
terse-mode
Fallback ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage 75% by dropping filler, articles, and pleasantries while keeping full technical accuracy. Use ONLY when context is critically long and compressing output is necessary to continue. Not a strategy — token discipline comes from code shape (small functions…