Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kubev2v/forklift-console-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/provider-controller)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/provider-controller"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/provider-controller/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/provider-controller"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin/provider-controller.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.03921 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01568 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00784 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00392 |
Grade A, and why
provider-controller scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 29d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 361 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Provider Controller (Common)
Analyzed from commit:
baf9c7bccon2026-09-17Source paths:pkg/controller/provider/controller.go,pkg/controller/provider/validation.go,pkg/controller/provider/validation/,pkg/controller/provider/container/,pkg/controller/provider/web/
Source: forklift backend — runs inside the Inventory controller (forklift-controller with inventory role).
Package Purpose
The provider controller reconciles Provider CRs: validates credentials and settings, manages OVA/Hyper-V provider-server sidecars, builds per-provider inventory collectors (SQLite-backed), serves the inventory REST API, and publishes status.phase plus conditions the console reads. It is the central orchestrator for all source/target provider types.
Key Types and Structs
type Reconciler struct {
base.Reconciler
catalog *Catalog // thread-safe map for post-delete collector lookup
container *libcontainer.Container
web *libweb.WebServer
}
type Catalog struct {
mutex sync.Mutex
content map[reconcile.Request]*api.Provider
}
Phase constants (validation.go):
const (
ValidationFailed = "ValidationFailed"
ConnectionFailed = "ConnectionFailed"
Ready = "Ready"
Staging = "Staging"
)
Interfaces and Implementations
validation.Runner (breaks import cycle)
pkg/controller/provider/validation/ dispatches provider-type-specific checks via a Runner interface implemented by Reconciler:
| Method | Provider types |
|---|---|
ValidateForkliftInstalled |
openshift (remote only) |
ValidateVSpherePrivileges |
vsphere |
ValidateSSHReadiness |
vsphere (when esxiCloneMethod=ssh) |
ValidateSMBCSI |
hyperv |
ValidateHyperVSettings |
hyperv |
EC2 validation runs via pkg/provider/ec2/controller/validation.Validator directly (no Runner method).
libcontainer.Collector
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 29d ago Changed · +110 lines 04342f1600ff
- 1mo ago First seen · 251 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 33f946d7b94a
provider-controller is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository kubev2v/forklift-console-plugin (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 3,921 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
api-property-optionality-hygiene
Fix ApiProperty/ApiPropertyOptional optionality mismatches in DTO files; use for scheduled batch fixes or DTO edits.
python
Python best practices and patterns for modern software development with Flask and SQLite.
cursor
You are working on the checkout service. Preserve transaction integrity and auditability.
django
Definitive guidelines for writing maintainable, performant, and secure Django applications, emphasizing modern best practices, clear code organization, and efficient patterns.
selectools-providers
Rules for working with LLM provider adapters in selectools.
env-validation-gate
Env validation gate — every app with ≥1 required env var validates its contract at boot via Zod; raw process.env is banned outside the env module. Full pattern in .claude/skills/t2000-env-gate/.