Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lis186/taiwan-holiday-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/lis186/taiwan-holiday-mcp/prompt-optimizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/lis186/taiwan-holiday-mcp/prompt-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/lis186/taiwan-holiday-mcp/prompt-optimizer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/lis186/taiwan-holiday-mcp/prompt-optimizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/lis186/taiwan-holiday-mcp/prompt-optimizer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00081 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00041 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00016 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00008 |
Grade A, and why
prompt-optimizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- prompt-optimizer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
以下是我的意圖，先別執行，幫我最佳化 prompt。
{原來使用者輸入的 prompt}
注意！先別執行！先別執行！先別執行！，產出改善的 prompt 之後，立刻呼叫 interactive-feedback-mcp。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 11 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f950d6dbcd1e
prompt-optimizer is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository lis186/taiwan-holiday-mcp (27 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 81 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
baml
A set of rules for setting up BAML and help with syntax guidance.
co-dialectic
Co-Dialectic prompt sharpening and verification rules for Cursor.
prompt-routing
Route tasks to the correct Universal AI Engineering Prompt.
prompting-for-qe
Soạn/tinh chỉnh prompt cho tác vụ QE (sinh test case, phân tích requirement, tóm tắt tài liệu test, phân tích log) — đặc biệt khi output AI lan man, chung chung, bịa, hoặc muốn chốt prompt thành template tái dùng.
llm-zod-jsonschema
Best Practice for LLM Output Parsing with Zod and JSON Schema.
prompt-evals
Prompt eval fixtures — case design, assertions, versioning, CI gates, no PII in golden data.