code-review

A set of checks to apply before submitting or pushing code to GitHub. It includes reviewing changes, creating a Mermaid diagram, checking Go-specific mistakes, and preparing a commit message.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for pre-pull-request reviews, Go code checks, change diagrams, scope checks, and commit-message creation.
Why use it?
It helps catch unclear code, missing project conventions, and unsupported reasoning before a pull request is submitted. It also makes changes easier to explain and review.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/openshift/hypershift/code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openshift/hypershift

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 3 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 226 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00003 $0.00226
Opus 5 $0.00002 $0.00113
Sonnet 5 $0.00001 $0.00045
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00023

Measured yesterday against content hash a3f06a80c1ea, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/code-review.mdc · 27 lines

What it actually says

Prior to submitting or pushing code to Github, these steps should be reviewed

Reviewing the introduced changes

Generate a mermaid diagram with the introduced code

  • if you add enumerations, remove the . and change them to -
  • Always in english
  • Avoid using {} or () in the names

Generate a commit message according the code changed in the PR:

  • All commit messages should follow the format outlined in the @git-commit-format.mdc rule.

Basic Rules

  • If a code change does not make any sense, please call that out
  • Don't provide reasoning without supporting evidence

100-go-mistakes rules taken from https://100go.co/

  • Follow the @100-go-mistakes.mdc rules

How code should be scoped

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 27 lines · 3 tokens per session scan A a3f06a80c1ea

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository openshift/hypershift (538 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 3 tokens to every session and 226 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.