Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PackmindHub/packmindWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/packmindhub/packmind/standard-integration-tests-structure-and-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/packmindhub/packmind/standard-integration-tests-structure-and-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/packmindhub/packmind/standard-integration-tests-structure-and-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/packmindhub/packmind/standard-integration-tests-structure-and-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/packmindhub/packmind/standard-integration-tests-structure-and-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00394 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00158 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00079 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
standard-integration-tests-structure-and-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Standard: Integration Tests Structure and Patterns
Define testing patterns for integration tests in the Packmind monorepo to ensure consistent organization, proper resource management, and comprehensive test coverage using hexagonal architecture princ... :
- Access domain adapters through testContext.testApp.Hexa.getAdapter() hexagonal architecture pattern
- Clean up database connections in afterEach with datasource.destroy() when datasource is initialized in beforeEach
- Clear all mocks in afterEach using jest.clearAllMocks() to prevent inter-test pollution
- Create test data using factory functions (e.g., changeProposalFactory()) for consistent, realistic test fixtures
- Declare all test variables with explicit types at the top of the test suite before beforeEach hooks
- Initialize test context in beforeEach using await getContext() and assign to a local testContext variable
- Mock external dependencies using jest.spyOn() instead of manual mock creation
- Restore all mocks in afterEach using jest.restoreAllMocks() after tests that use jest.spyOn()
- Test both success and failure scenarios for comprehensive coverage
- Use .toHaveLength() for array length assertions instead of manual .length checks
- Use expect.objectContaining() for partial object matching when testing subset of properties
- Use nested describe('when...') blocks to organize test scenarios with shared setup in beforeEach
- Use one primary assertion per test case for clarity and easier debugging
- Use typed domain entities from @packmind/types for all test data to ensure type safety
- Use verb-first test names without should prefix for assertive, clear descriptions
- Wrap integration tests with integrationTestWithUser((getContext) => {...}) to provide authenticated user context
Full standard is available here for further request: Integration Tests Structure and Patterns
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 25 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2677d6e5f189
standard-integration-tests-structure-and-patterns is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository PackmindHub/packmind (319 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 394 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
running-tests
How to run tests, check for failures, and rerun specific failing tests — use the :agent variants of slow commands.
demo
Run the Todo example end-to-end demo.
testing-fundamentals
Core Cypress testing principles — selector strategy, smart waiting, and spec organization. Apply when writing or reviewing Cypress E2E tests.
test
You are a senior test engineer.
integration-testing
Integration testing patterns and database test setup.
fusebase-flow-validation
Fusebase Flow validation/verification phase rules. Use when running gate checks, reviewing diffs, or verifying smoke prompts.