Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ragnar-johannsson/mcp-sgfWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/ragnar-johannsson/mcp-sgf/generate-tasks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ragnar-johannsson/mcp-sgf/generate-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ragnar-johannsson/mcp-sgf/generate-tasks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ragnar-johannsson/mcp-sgf/generate-tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ragnar-johannsson/mcp-sgf/generate-tasks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00902 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00451 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00180 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
generate-tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to generate-tasks — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Rule: Generating a Task List from a PRD
Goal
To guide an AI assistant in creating a detailed, step-by-step task list in Markdown format based on an existing Product Requirements Document (PRD). The task list should guide a developer through implementation.
Output
- Format: Markdown (
.md) - Location:
/tasks/ - Filename:
tasks-[prd-file-name].md(e.g.,tasks-prd-user-profile-editing.md)
Process
- Receive PRD Reference: The user points the AI to a specific PRD file
- Analyze PRD: The AI reads and analyzes the functional requirements, user stories, and other sections of the specified PRD.
- Phase 1: Generate Parent Tasks: Based on the PRD analysis, create the file and generate the main, high-level tasks required to implement the feature. Use your judgement on how many high-level tasks to use. It's likely to be about 5. Present these tasks to the user in the specified format (without sub-tasks yet). Inform the user: "I have generated the high-level tasks based on the PRD. Ready to generate the sub-tasks? Respond with 'Go' to proceed."
- Wait for Confirmation: Pause and wait for the user to respond with "Go".
- Phase 2: Generate Sub-Tasks: Once the user confirms, break down each parent task into smaller, actionable sub-tasks necessary to complete the parent task. Ensure sub-tasks logically follow from the parent task and cover the implementation details implied by the PRD.
- Identify Relevant Files: Based on the tasks and PRD, identify potential files that will need to be created or modified. List these under the
Relevant Filessection, including corresponding test files if applicable. - Generate Final Output: Combine the parent tasks, sub-tasks, relevant files, and notes into the final Markdown structure.
- Save Task List: Save the generated document in the
/tasks/directory with the filenametasks-[prd-file-name].md, where[prd-file-name]matches the base name of the input PRD file (e.g., if the input wasprd-user-profile-editing.md, the output istasks-prd-user-profile-editing.md).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 65 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 8dfd07eb2ad6
generate-tasks is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository ragnar-johannsson/mcp-sgf (0 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 902 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to generate-tasks, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
slice-tasks
PLANNING SPINE STEP 2 of 3 — Slice the work: break a scoped PRD into vertical-slice stories in specs/epics/. Use after scope-work (step 1), before plan-work (step 3). Not a substitute for scope-work or plan-work.
iris
GitHub operations specialist — branches, pull requests, issues, releases, tags. Called by zeus after review. Never pushes or merges without explicit human approval. Integrates with VS Code GitHub Pull Requests extension.
elite-orchestrator
Elite orchestrator for mission-critical, enterprise-scale tasks requiring strategic coordination of 7+ agents across all domains. Makes architectural decisions, manages risk, ensures business continuity, and delivers enterprise-grade outcomes. Use for platform migrations, security incidents, multi-system integrations…
feedback-enhanced
Rules for an interactive feedback system that lets users and an AI agent discuss complex development work in real time. It includes guidance for recording decisions, tracking progress and handling detailed inputs such as code and diagrams.
project-onboarding-rule
Automatically onboards existing projects into the AI-driven development workflow.
linear-in-review
After finishing a Linear issue, set its status to In Review (never Done).