Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc/auth0git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc/auth0)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc/auth0"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc/auth0.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00931 | $0.00931 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00465 | $0.00465 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00186 | $0.00186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00093 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
auth0 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
auth0 Best Practices
This guide outlines the definitive best practices for integrating Auth0 into our applications. Adhering to these standards is critical for maintaining a robust security posture against modern identity threats.
1. Prioritize Universal Login
Always centralize authentication flows using Auth0 Universal Login. This offloads complex security logic, ensures consistency, and leverages Auth0's built-in security features across all applications (web, mobile, AI agents).
❌ BAD: Implementing custom login forms or embedded login This introduces significant security risks and maintenance overhead.
✅ GOOD: Redirecting to Universal Login with Auth0 SDKs
// Example for a React/SPA using @auth0/auth0-react (built on auth0-spa-js)
import { useAuth0 } from '@auth0/auth0-react';
function LoginButton() {
const { loginWithRedirect } = useAuth0();
const handleLogin = () => {
loginWithRedirect({
appState: { targetUrl: window.location.pathname },
authorizationParams: {
redirect_uri: window.location.origin + '/callback',
scope: 'openid profile email', // Request only necessary scopes
},
});
};
return <button onClick={handleLogin}>Log In</button>;
}
2. Enforce Authorization Code Flow with PKCE
For all public clients (SPAs, mobile apps, native desktop apps), the Authorization Code Flow with Proof Key for Code Exchange (PKCE) is the only acceptable grant type. This prevents authorization code injection attacks. Never use Implicit Grant or Resource Owner Password Grant (ROPG).
❌ BAD: Using Implicit Grant or ROPG These flows are deprecated and highly vulnerable.
// ❌ BAD: Implicit Grant (responseType: 'token id_token')
// Avoid configuring your Auth0 application to allow this.
// ❌ BAD: ROPG (sending username/password directly to /oauth/token)
// Never trust the client with user credentials.
✅ GOOD: Authorization Code Flow with PKCE
Ensure your Auth0 application is configured for PKCE, and your SDK handles the code_challenge and code_verifier.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 105 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 8d6a3159a9cc
auth0 is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository sanjeed5/awesome-cursor-rules-mdc (3,571 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed CC0-1.0. It adds 931 tokens to every session, about $0.0047 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
executing-red-team-engagement-planning
Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins.
solana-integration-constraints
Constraints and requirements for Solana integration with MetaMask Connect — wallet adapter config, CAIP-2 IDs, network support per platform, RPC routing, and platform limitations.
visual-and-observational-rules
Defines the visual aspects of the game and how the player observes the world. This includes map color-coding, screen effects, and the overall simulation style.
018_DSPy_InputField_OutputField
DSPy 3.0.1 Field Definitions - Master InputField and OutputField for precise signature control.
python-cryptographic-failures
Detect and prevent cryptographic failures in Python applications as defined in OWASP Top 10:2021-A02.
solana_core_architecture
┌─────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Entry Point │ │ Instruction │ │ Account │ │ lib.rs │───▶│ Processing │───▶│ Validation │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ - entrypoint! │ │ - Route dispatch │ │ - Owner checks │ │ - processinst │ │ - Deserialize │ │ - Data validate │.