Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sanpelegrino/tableau-mcp-testWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/sanpelegrino/tableau-mcp-test/testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/sanpelegrino/tableau-mcp-test/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/sanpelegrino/tableau-mcp-test/testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/sanpelegrino/tableau-mcp-test/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/sanpelegrino/tableau-mcp-test/testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00634 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00254 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00127 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to testing — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Standards
Framework: Vitest
This project uses Vitest. NOT jest, NOT mocha.
Test Configs
| Config | Command | Directory | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
vitest.config.ts |
npm test |
src/ |
Unit tests |
vitest.config.e2e.ts |
npm run test:e2e |
tests/e2e/ |
End-to-end (stdio client) |
vitest.config.eval.ts |
npm run test:eval |
tests/eval/ |
AI agent evaluation |
vitest.config.oauth.embedded.ts |
npm run test:oauth:embedded |
tests/oauth/embedded-authz/ |
OAuth flows |
Coverage: npm run coverage (v8 provider, cobertura reporter)
Unit Test Setup
src/testSetup.ts automatically:
- Mocks
Serverclass - Mocks
RestApiclass - Stubs environment variables
Unit tests live alongside source: src/tools/myTool/myTool.test.ts
E2E Test Pattern
Tests use StdioClientTransport spawning node build/index.js:
import { callTool, getClient, listTools } from './client';
describe('my-tool', () => {
it('returns expected data', async () => {
const result = await callTool('my-tool', { param: 'value' });
expect(result).toBeDefined();
});
});
Helpers in tests/e2e/client.ts: callTool(), listTools(), getClient()
Test Naming
- Test files:
*.test.ts(co-located with source for unit tests) - Test names: describe the behavior being verified
- One behavior per test — if "and" appears in the name, split it
Mocking Rules
- Use real code whenever possible — mocks only when unavoidable
src/testSetup.tsprovides standard mocks for Server and RestApi- When mocking Tableau API responses, use realistic data shapes
- Never mock the code under test — mock its dependencies
Running Tests
# Unit tests (fast, run these constantly)
npm test
# Single file
npx vitest run src/tools/myTool/myTool.test.ts
# Watch mode
npx vitest src/tools/myTool/myTool.test.ts
# E2E (requires build first)
npm run build && npm run test:e2e
# Coverage report
npm run coverage
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 81 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f15d2089e118
testing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository Sanpelegrino/tableau-mcp-test (0 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 634 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to testing, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
use-contract-ir-factories
Use factory functions for creating ContractIR objects instead of manual object creation.
gonavi-go
A Go coding rule set for the GoNavi repository, based on common Go style guides and the project's own conventions. It covers file structure, errors, context, concurrency, logging, and tests.
python-general-coding-standards
A set of general standards for Python projects, including type hints, input checking, code style, security, web requests, background work, and tests. It also covers FastAPI-specific tasks such as CORS and authentication.
mockito
This guide provides definitive best practices for writing robust, maintainable, and readable unit tests using Mockito with JUnit 5, focusing on modern patterns and common pitfalls.
spec-for-ut
Unit testing is essential to ensure the reliability and stability of code, especially for React components and functions. Adhering to best practices and ensuring high test coverage is critical to maintaining a robust codebase.
unit-testing-standards
Cursor rule "unit-testing-standards" from adobecom/da-express-milo, covering unit testing standards, testing philosophy, testing framework stack, test structure patterns and 1. standard test file organization.