Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tableau/tableau-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/tableau/tableau-mcp/testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/tableau/tableau-mcp/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/tableau/tableau-mcp/testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/tableau/tableau-mcp/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/tableau/tableau-mcp/testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00634 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00254 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00127 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Standards
Framework: Vitest
This project uses Vitest. NOT jest, NOT mocha.
Test Configs
| Config | Command | Directory | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
vitest.config.ts |
npm test |
src/ |
Unit tests |
vitest.config.e2e.ts |
npm run test:e2e |
tests/e2e/ |
End-to-end (stdio client) |
vitest.config.eval.ts |
npm run test:eval |
tests/eval/ |
AI agent evaluation |
vitest.config.oauth.embedded.ts |
npm run test:oauth:embedded |
tests/oauth/embedded-authz/ |
OAuth flows |
Coverage: npm run coverage (v8 provider, cobertura reporter)
Unit Test Setup
src/testSetup.ts automatically:
- Mocks
Serverclass - Mocks
RestApiclass - Stubs environment variables
Unit tests live alongside source: src/tools/myTool/myTool.test.ts
E2E Test Pattern
Tests use StdioClientTransport spawning node build/index.js:
import { callTool, getClient, listTools } from './client';
describe('my-tool', () => {
it('returns expected data', async () => {
const result = await callTool('my-tool', { param: 'value' });
expect(result).toBeDefined();
});
});
Helpers in tests/e2e/client.ts: callTool(), listTools(), getClient()
Test Naming
- Test files:
*.test.ts(co-located with source for unit tests) - Test names: describe the behavior being verified
- One behavior per test — if "and" appears in the name, split it
Mocking Rules
- Use real code whenever possible — mocks only when unavoidable
src/testSetup.tsprovides standard mocks for Server and RestApi- When mocking Tableau API responses, use realistic data shapes
- Never mock the code under test — mock its dependencies
Running Tests
# Unit tests (fast, run these constantly)
npm test
# Single file
npx vitest run src/tools/myTool/myTool.test.ts
# Watch mode
npx vitest src/tools/myTool/myTool.test.ts
# E2E (requires build first)
npm run build && npm run test:e2e
# Coverage report
npm run coverage
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 81 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f15d2089e118
testing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository tableau/tableau-mcp (360 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 634 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
tdd
Final Verification: Always use: go test -v ./backend/api/handler/... | grep FAIL.
logging-standards
Use the Operative Control Center logging system instead of print statements.
python-code-validator
Validate generated Python at every step, not once at the end.
chrono-mcp-standards
Chrono MCP Project Standards and Guidelines.
testing-conventions
Testing conventions and techniques for Strapi MCP plugin.
development-workflow
Cursor rule "development-workflow" from floriscornel/todo-mcp, covering development workflow for todo mcp, testing & quality assurance, commit structure, branch & pr workflow and publication & releases.