Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/yoshitakaarakawa/tableau-mcp-apps-lab/testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/YoshitakaArakawa/tableau-mcp-apps-labWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/yoshitakaarakawa/tableau-mcp-apps-lab/testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/yoshitakaarakawa/tableau-mcp-apps-lab/testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/yoshitakaarakawa/tableau-mcp-apps-lab/testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00634 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00317 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00127 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to testing — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Testing Standards
Framework: Vitest
This project uses Vitest. NOT jest, NOT mocha.
Test Configs
| Config | Command | Directory | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
vitest.config.ts |
npm test |
src/ |
Unit tests |
vitest.config.e2e.ts |
npm run test:e2e |
tests/e2e/ |
End-to-end (stdio client) |
vitest.config.eval.ts |
npm run test:eval |
tests/eval/ |
AI agent evaluation |
vitest.config.oauth.embedded.ts |
npm run test:oauth:embedded |
tests/oauth/embedded-authz/ |
OAuth flows |
Coverage: npm run coverage (v8 provider, cobertura reporter)
Unit Test Setup
src/testSetup.ts automatically:
- Mocks
Serverclass - Mocks
RestApiclass - Stubs environment variables
Unit tests live alongside source: src/tools/myTool/myTool.test.ts
E2E Test Pattern
Tests use StdioClientTransport spawning node build/index.js:
import { callTool, getClient, listTools } from './client';
describe('my-tool', () => {
it('returns expected data', async () => {
const result = await callTool('my-tool', { param: 'value' });
expect(result).toBeDefined();
});
});
Helpers in tests/e2e/client.ts: callTool(), listTools(), getClient()
Test Naming
- Test files:
*.test.ts(co-located with source for unit tests) - Test names: describe the behavior being verified
- One behavior per test — if "and" appears in the name, split it
Mocking Rules
- Use real code whenever possible — mocks only when unavoidable
src/testSetup.tsprovides standard mocks for Server and RestApi- When mocking Tableau API responses, use realistic data shapes
- Never mock the code under test — mock its dependencies
Running Tests
# Unit tests (fast, run these constantly)
npm test
# Single file
npx vitest run src/tools/myTool/myTool.test.ts
# Watch mode
npx vitest src/tools/myTool/myTool.test.ts
# E2E (requires build first)
npm run build && npm run test:e2e
# Coverage report
npm run coverage
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 81 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f15d2089e118
testing is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository YoshitakaArakawa/tableau-mcp-apps-lab (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 634 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to testing, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
300-testing
Comprehensive testing guide covering unit, integration, E2E, test frameworks, patterns, and CI/CD integration.
hatch3r-testing
Coverage thresholds, mocking strategy, property-based testing, mutation-score targets, flaky test quarantine, and snapshot test discipline.
issues-tests
Backend test conventions — QuarkusTest, REST Assured, Given, ArchUnit.
testing
Cursor rule "testing" from andersonlemesc/Oryntra, covering testes oryntra, laravel (pest), python (pytest), contract tests (laravel ↔ python) and browser/e2e.
do-runner
Use the following runners.
tester
Tester role - Unit, E2E, and visual regression testing.