Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/silenceinsect/aidocxworkflow/s1_compliance_checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SilenceInsect/AIDocxWorkFlowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/silenceinsect/aidocxworkflow/s1_compliance_check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/silenceinsect/aidocxworkflow/s1_compliance_check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/silenceinsect/aidocxworkflow/s1_compliance_check.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.03655 | $0.03655 |
| Opus 5 | $0.01827 | $0.01827 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00731 | $0.00731 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00365 | $0.00365 |
Grade A, and why
S1_COMPLIANCE_CHECK scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 326 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
合规风险校验记录 — 方法论规范
适用范围：S1 需求评审阶段的"合规风险校验"产出规范 编号：S1-CP-001（Compliance Check Method） 版本：v1.1 依据：基于资深测试评审标准 + 游戏行业合规要求
0. 输入来源（v18.1 新增）
v18.1 新增：明确本方法论的输入材料来源，支持从人工澄清目录读取。
可选输入来源：
| 来源 | 路径 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|
| 人工澄清 | resource/<req_name>/<version>_clarification.xlsx |
优先级最高，若存在则优先读取其中的合规风险相关说明 |
| 原始需求 | resource/<req_name>/<version>_raw.<ext> |
核心输入，基于需求内容评估合规风险 |
流程：S1 执行时优先从
resource/<req_name>/<version>_clarification.xlsx读取人工澄清内容（如有）。若无人工澄清文件，直接基于原始需求文档评估合规风险。
1. 核心概念
1.1 什么是合规风险校验
针对版号、监管要求逐条核对需求，确保满足合规要求。
1.2 合规检查范围
| 合规类型 | 说明 | 典型场景 |
|---|---|---|
| 防沉迷 | 未成年人游戏时间限制 | 时长限制、宵禁、强制休息 |
| 充值限额 | 未成年人付费限制 | 单笔/月累计限额 |
| 抽奖概率公示 | 概率类活动公示要求 | 抽卡、扭蛋概率展示 |
| 敏感词 | 聊天/昵称/留言过滤 | 敏感词拦截 |
| 版号合规 | 游戏版号相关要求 | 实名认证、健康游戏忠告 |
| 隐私协议 | 用户数据收集合规 | 隐私协议弹窗、数据收集说明 |
| 广告规范 | 广告展示规范 | 关闭按钮、误点拦截 |
2. 合规检查矩阵
2.1 防沉迷合规
| # | 检查项 | 要求 | 需求中是否涉及 | 验证方式 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 实名认证 | 登录前必须实名认证 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 2 | 时长限制 | 未成年人每日游戏时长限制 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 3 | 宵禁限制 | 特定时间段禁止游戏 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 4 | 强制休息 | 连续游戏时长超限强制休息 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 5 | 家长监护 | 提供家长监护功能 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 6 | 实名弹窗 | 首次登录弹窗提醒 | ✅/❌ | UI 测试 |
| 7 | 健康游戏忠告 | 游戏登录界面展示 | ✅/❌ | UI 测试 |
2.2 充值付费合规
| # | 检查项 | 要求 | 需求中是否涉及 | 验证方式 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 付费限额 | 未成年人单笔/月累计付费限额 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 2 | 充值弹窗 | 大额充值弹窗确认 | ✅/❌ | UI 测试 |
| 3 | 充值冷静期 | 超过限额后需等待 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 4 | 退款政策 | 退款流程和限制 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 5 | 支付密码 | 未成年人需支付密码 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 6 | 充值记录 | 充值记录清晰可查 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
2.3 抽奖概率公示
| # | 检查项 | 要求 | 需求中是否涉及 | 验证方式 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 概率公示 | 抽卡/扭蛋等活动概率公示 | ✅/❌ | UI 测试 |
| 2 | 概率展示位置 | 概率在显眼位置展示 | ✅/❌ | UI 测试 |
| 3 | 概率更新通知 | 概率变更需提前通知 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 4 | 保底机制 | 保底次数和规则公示 | ✅/❌ | UI 测试 |
| 5 | 历史记录 | 提供抽取历史记录 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
2.4 敏感词合规
| # | 检查项 | 要求 | 需求中是否涉及 | 验证方式 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 聊天敏感词 | 聊天内容敏感词过滤 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 2 | 昵称敏感词 | 昵称敏感词过滤 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 3 | 留言敏感词 | 留言板敏感词过滤 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 4 | 自定义敏感词 | 支持自定义敏感词库 | ✅/❌ | 功能测试 |
| 5 | 敏感词提示 | 敏感词拦截提示文案 | ✅/❌ | UI 测试 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 326 lines · 3,655 tokens per session scan A 286e955c84ab
S1_COMPLIANCE_CHECK is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository SilenceInsect/AIDocxWorkFlow (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 3,655 tokens to every session, about $0.0183 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
08-client-server
IF 判断当前环境是否为客户端 → FabricLoader.getInstance().getEnvironmentType() == EnvType.CLIENT → World.isClient（Yarn 字段；yarn 1.14.4 World.mapping）。不要用 MCP/Forge 的 isRemote.
07-datagen
IF 生成物品/方块模型 JSON → 手动编写 JSON 在 src/main/resources/assets/{modid}/models/.
legal-advisor
Draft privacy policies, terms of service, disclaimers, and legal notices. Creates GDPR-compliant texts, cookie policies, and data processing agreements.
meta-quest-agentic-tools
Use Meta Quest Agentic Tools for Meta Quest and Horizon OS samples.
00-project-overview
Base project rule — purpose, constraints, and defaults for mcp-5etools.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.