Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/squirrelogic/cursor-rules/solid-principlesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/squirrelogic/cursor-rulesWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.01081 | $0.01081 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00541 | $0.00541 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00216 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00108 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
solid-principles scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- solid-principles — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SOLID Principles
Guidelines for implementing SOLID principles in the codebase.
actions:
-
type: suggest message: | When writing code, follow these SOLID principles:
-
Single Responsibility Principle (SRP):
- Each class/module should have only one reason to change
- Keep classes focused and cohesive
- Extract separate concerns into their own classes Example:
// Good: Single responsibility class UserAuthentication { authenticate(credentials: Credentials): boolean { ... } } class UserProfile { updateProfile(data: ProfileData): void { ... } } // Bad: Multiple responsibilities class User { authenticate(credentials: Credentials): boolean { ... } updateProfile(data: ProfileData): void { ... } sendEmail(message: string): void { ... } } -
Open/Closed Principle (OCP):
- Classes should be open for extension but closed for modification
- Use interfaces and abstract classes
- Implement new functionality through inheritance/composition Example:
// Good: Open for extension interface PaymentProcessor { process(payment: Payment): void; } class CreditCardProcessor implements PaymentProcessor { ... } class PayPalProcessor implements PaymentProcessor { ... } // Bad: Closed for extension class PaymentProcessor { process(payment: Payment, type: string): void { if (type === 'credit') { ... } else if (type === 'paypal') { ... } } } -
Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP):
- Derived classes must be substitutable for their base classes
- Maintain expected behavior when using inheritance
- Don't violate base class contracts Example:
// Good: Derived class maintains base contract class Bird { fly(): void { ... } } class Sparrow extends Bird { fly(): void { ... } // Implements flying behavior } // Bad: Violates base contract class Penguin extends Bird { fly(): void { throw new Error("Can't fly!"); // Violates base class contract } } -
Interface Segregation Principle (ISP):
- Don't force clients to depend on interfaces they don't use
- Keep interfaces small and focused
- Split large interfaces into smaller ones Example:
// Good: Segregated interfaces interface Readable { read(): void; } interface Writable { write(data: string): void; } // Bad: Fat interface interface FileSystem { read(): void; write(data: string): void; delete(): void; create(): void; modify(): void; } -
Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP):
- High-level modules shouldn't depend on low-level modules
- Both should depend on abstractions
- Use dependency injection Example:
// Good: Depends on abstraction interface Logger { log(message: string): void; } class UserService { constructor(private logger: Logger) {} } // Bad: Depends on concrete implementation class UserService { private logger = new FileLogger(); }
-
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 186 lines · 1,081 tokens per session scan A 12a98459531e
solid-principles is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository squirrelogic/cursor-rules (20 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,081 tokens to every session, about $0.0054 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
typescript
Changes to these high-fan-out internals can affect every message, delta, element, or rerun. Keep work in them minimal, and benchmark changes with representative stress-test apps.
coolify-ai-docs
Master reference to all Coolify AI documentation in .ai/ directory.
python_lib
Tips and guidelines specific to the development of the Streamlit Python library, not applicable to scripts and e2e tests.
specs
This directory contains product and tech specs for Streamlit features.