Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/squirrelogic/mcp-feature-discussion/solid-principlesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/squirrelogic/mcp-feature-discussionWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.01081 | $0.01081 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00541 | $0.00541 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00216 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00108 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
solid-principles scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to solid-principles — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
SOLID Principles
Guidelines for implementing SOLID principles in the codebase.
actions:
-
type: suggest message: | When writing code, follow these SOLID principles:
-
Single Responsibility Principle (SRP):
- Each class/module should have only one reason to change
- Keep classes focused and cohesive
- Extract separate concerns into their own classes Example:
// Good: Single responsibility class UserAuthentication { authenticate(credentials: Credentials): boolean { ... } } class UserProfile { updateProfile(data: ProfileData): void { ... } } // Bad: Multiple responsibilities class User { authenticate(credentials: Credentials): boolean { ... } updateProfile(data: ProfileData): void { ... } sendEmail(message: string): void { ... } } -
Open/Closed Principle (OCP):
- Classes should be open for extension but closed for modification
- Use interfaces and abstract classes
- Implement new functionality through inheritance/composition Example:
// Good: Open for extension interface PaymentProcessor { process(payment: Payment): void; } class CreditCardProcessor implements PaymentProcessor { ... } class PayPalProcessor implements PaymentProcessor { ... } // Bad: Closed for extension class PaymentProcessor { process(payment: Payment, type: string): void { if (type === 'credit') { ... } else if (type === 'paypal') { ... } } } -
Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP):
- Derived classes must be substitutable for their base classes
- Maintain expected behavior when using inheritance
- Don't violate base class contracts Example:
// Good: Derived class maintains base contract class Bird { fly(): void { ... } } class Sparrow extends Bird { fly(): void { ... } // Implements flying behavior } // Bad: Violates base contract class Penguin extends Bird { fly(): void { throw new Error("Can't fly!"); // Violates base class contract } } -
Interface Segregation Principle (ISP):
- Don't force clients to depend on interfaces they don't use
- Keep interfaces small and focused
- Split large interfaces into smaller ones Example:
// Good: Segregated interfaces interface Readable { read(): void; } interface Writable { write(data: string): void; } // Bad: Fat interface interface FileSystem { read(): void; write(data: string): void; delete(): void; create(): void; modify(): void; } -
Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP):
- High-level modules shouldn't depend on low-level modules
- Both should depend on abstractions
- Use dependency injection Example:
// Good: Depends on abstraction interface Logger { log(message: string): void; } class UserService { constructor(private logger: Logger) {} } // Bad: Depends on concrete implementation class UserService { private logger = new FileLogger(); }
-
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 186 lines · 1,081 tokens per session scan A 12a98459531e
solid-principles is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository squirrelogic/mcp-feature-discussion (1 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,081 tokens to every session, about $0.0054 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to solid-principles, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.
family-instance-domain-actions
Family instance domain action implementation patterns.