Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TashanGKD/cognitive-osWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/tashangkd/cognitive-os/cognitive-insight-guard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/tashangkd/cognitive-os/cognitive-insight-guard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/tashangkd/cognitive-os/cognitive-insight-guard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/tashangkd/cognitive-os/cognitive-insight-guard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/tashangkd/cognitive-os/cognitive-insight-guard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00327 | $0.00327 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00163 | $0.00163 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00065 | $0.00065 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00033 |
Grade A, and why
cognitive-insight-guard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
洞见守卫（cognitive-insight-guard）
每条用户消息后，内部自问
「用户是否在表达：视角转换 / 概念纠错 / 本质澄清 / 设计原则 / 架构哲学 / 反复出现的纠正？」
IF 是 → 完成当前任务后，在回复末尾附：
「💡 检测到洞见：[一句话提炼]
[✅ 记录为碎片] [⭐ 提炼为原则] [跳过]」
IF 否 → 静默，不输出任何额外内容
禁止
❌ 禁止：打断任务执行来提示洞见（先完成任务，末尾再提示）
❌ 禁止：对每句话都触发（只对含认知价值的内容触发）
❌ 禁止：自动记录而不询问用户（用户有主权决定是否沉淀）
触发后
用户选「记录」→ 触发 cognitive-capture-fragment
用户选「提炼」→ 触发 cognitive-extract-principle
用户选「跳过」→ 不再提起
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 36 lines · 327 tokens per session scan A 93e5cc039272
cognitive-insight-guard is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository TashanGKD/cognitive-os (8 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 327 tokens to every session, about $0.0016 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
role-menu
A role menu for a Chinese AI product team that maps development tasks to specialized roles and skills, such as product, frontend, backend, testing, and DevOps.
session-bootstrap
A session procedure that tells an AI assistant which checks and steps to follow whenever it receives a message and when it finishes a task.
auto-experience-hook
A deprecated rule written in Chinese for automatically recording lessons after a task finishes, while directing current behavior to another session-startup rule.
deploy-arch-maintenance
A set of rules for keeping deployment and infrastructure documentation current. Deployment means putting software on servers or other systems so people can use it.
bug-fix-tdd-guard
A rule for fixing software bugs with test-driven development, or TDD: first reproduce the bug, then write a test that fails, then make the smallest code change that passes it, and finally run the full checks.
cognitive-structure-write-guard
A set of writing safeguards for changing core cognitive-structure documents. It checks the file path and requires backups, change notes, source labels, related updates, and a system log.