Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add rules/techskies11/datadog-mcp/pydantic-modelsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/techskies11/datadog-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/techskies11/datadog-mcp/pydantic-models)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/techskies11/datadog-mcp/pydantic-models"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/techskies11/datadog-mcp/pydantic-models.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02037 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01019 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00407 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00204 |
Grade A, and why
pydantic-models scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 212 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pydantic for FastMCP
Use Pydantic models for ALL tool inputs and outputs - never TypedDict, never
dict[str, object]. This project has two distinct model families with
different strictness, defined once in src/datadog_mcp/utils/response.py
and reused everywhere. Getting the family right matters more than any single
ConfigDict flag below.
The Two Model Families
Inbound: DatadogModel - tolerant, for parsing Datadog API responses
from datadog_mcp.utils.response import DatadogModel
class LogEntry(DatadogModel):
"""A single log entry, flattened from Datadog's {id, type, attributes} envelope."""
id: str | None = None
message: str | None = None
timestamp: str | None = None
DatadogModel sets extra="ignore". Datadog can and does add new fields to
API responses without notice; strict inbound validation would turn every
such addition into a hard failure for this server. Never override this to
extra="forbid" on an inbound model.
Outbound: ToolResponse / PaginatedListResponse - strict, for tool return values
from datadog_mcp.utils.response import ToolResponse, PaginatedListResponse, finalize_list_response
class GetLogDetailsResponse(ToolResponse):
"""Response for `get_log_details`."""
log: LogEntry | None = None
class SearchLogsResponse(PaginatedListResponse):
"""Response for `search_logs`."""
logs: list[LogEntry] = Field(default_factory=list)
next_cursor: str | None = None
has_more: bool = False
ToolResponse sets extra="forbid" and already declares success: bool = True
and error: str | None = None. PaginatedListResponse additionally declares
count, truncated, warning, total_available. This is data the server
fully controls - every field must be declared up front, never injected ad-hoc
at a call site (no response["extra_debug_field"] = ...).
Use PaginatedListResponse (not plain ToolResponse) for any response whose
main payload is a single named list, then finalize it:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 212 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ed1e19577101
pydantic-models is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository techskies11/datadog-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,037 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.
prefer-direct-imports-over-module-mocks
Prefer extracting a testable core over vi.mock / vi.resetModules when unit tests need to reach production logic entangled with config, env, or singletons.
control-plane-descriptors
Control plane descriptor and instance implementation patterns.