Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/williamisnotdefined/rubiks-cube-solverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/williamisnotdefined/rubiks-cube-solver/api-boundary)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/williamisnotdefined/rubiks-cube-solver/api-boundary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/williamisnotdefined/rubiks-cube-solver/api-boundary/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/williamisnotdefined/rubiks-cube-solver/api-boundary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/williamisnotdefined/rubiks-cube-solver/api-boundary.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03050 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01220 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00610 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00305 |
Grade A, and why
api-boundary scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 207 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Generated from ai/registry.json. Do not edit manually.
Canonical skill: ../../ai/skills/api-boundary.md.
Referenced context:
../../ai/rules/api-rules.md../../ai/rules/frontend-rules.md../../ai/rules/testing-rules.md../../ai/architecture/api-boundary.md
This file is compiled from canonical AI knowledge files. Edit canonical files under ai, then run npm run ai:sync.
Compiled AI Skill: api-boundary
Canonical Skill: ai/skills/api-boundary.md
API Boundary
Use for Axum routes, contracts, validation, solver loading, scan sessions, or the matching web API client.
Read First
ai/rules/api-rules.mdai/rules/frontend-rules.mdai/rules/testing-rules.mdai/architecture/api-boundary.md
Workflow
- Inspect the focused route/response/solve modules and matching client contract.
- Keep engine semantics in Rust, HTTP limits and status mapping in Axum, and normalization in the web API domain.
- Preserve typed scan stickers and the server-side 308 WCA docs redirect where affected.
- Run API tests plus web tests/build when the browser contract changes.
Referenced Context
Reference: ai/rules/api-rules.md
API Rules
Rules for the Axum HTTP API and the frontend API contract.
Always
- Keep route handlers thin: extract state and JSON, validate request limits, choose the solver strategy, delegate to Rust engine code, and map results to HTTP responses.
- Keep solver behavior in
cube-engine;crates/apiowns HTTP shape, safety limits, generated-solver loading, CORS, and error/status mapping. - Use Serde request and response structs as the API contract.
- Keep notation solve requests on move notation and route scan solves through typed scan-session contracts, which MAY include reviewed stickers and manual overrides.
- Validate API safety limits before parsing notation or invoking search.
- Use named constants for public API caps such as maximum depth, maximum nodes, notation bytes, and JSON body bytes.
- Preserve stable response status strings, error kinds, and metadata fields because
apps/web/src/apinormalizes them. - Verify returned solutions by replay before reporting success.
- Keep generated pruning-table availability and corruption errors explicit in API responses.
- Keep CORS origins narrow to known local web development and preview origins unless deployment requirements change.
- Update
apps/web/src/apitypes and normalization when API response fields or status values change. - Keep
/api/wca-dataas an Axum HTTP 308 redirect to/api/wca-data/v1/docs; WCA data endpoints belong toapps/wca-data.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 207 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9dc33260384b
api-boundary is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository williamisnotdefined/rubiks-cube-solver (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,050 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
api-property-optionality-hygiene
Fix ApiProperty/ApiPropertyOptional optionality mismatches in DTO files; use for scheduled batch fixes or DTO edits.
python
Python best practices and patterns for modern software development with Flask and SQLite.
cursor
You are working on the checkout service. Preserve transaction integrity and auditability.
django
Definitive guidelines for writing maintainable, performant, and secure Django applications, emphasizing modern best practices, clear code organization, and efficient patterns.
shared-libraries
Shared libraries - condition framework, inventory containers, file-backed DB, itinerary, references.
selectools-providers
Rules for working with LLM provider adapters in selectools.