Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 01clauding/claude-seo-skill --skill seo-sitemapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/01clauding/claude-seo-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/01clauding/claude-seo-skill/seo-sitemap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/01clauding/claude-seo-skill/seo-sitemap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/01clauding/claude-seo-skill/seo-sitemap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/01clauding/claude-seo-skill/seo-sitemap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/01clauding/claude-seo-skill/seo-sitemap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.00838 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00335 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
seo-sitemap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to 30x-seo-sitemap — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sitemap Analysis & Generation
Mode 1: Analyze Existing Sitemap
Validation Checks
- Valid XML format
- URL count <50,000 per file (protocol limit)
- All URLs return HTTP 200
<lastmod>dates are accurate (not all identical)- No deprecated tags:
<priority>and<changefreq>are ignored by Google - Sitemap referenced in robots.txt
- Compare crawled pages vs sitemap — flag missing pages
Quality Signals
- Sitemap index file if >50k URLs
- Split by content type (pages, posts, images, videos)
- No non-canonical URLs in sitemap
- No noindexed URLs in sitemap
- No redirected URLs in sitemap
- HTTPS URLs only (no HTTP)
Common Issues
| Issue | Severity | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| >50k URLs in single file | Critical | Split with sitemap index |
| Non-200 URLs | High | Remove or fix broken URLs |
| Noindexed URLs included | High | Remove from sitemap |
| Redirected URLs included | Medium | Update to final URLs |
| All identical lastmod | Low | Use actual modification dates |
| Priority/changefreq used | Info | Can remove (ignored by Google) |
Mode 2: Generate New Sitemap
Process
- Ask for business type (or auto-detect from existing site)
- Load industry template from
assets/directory - Interactive structure planning with user
- Apply quality gates:
- ⚠️ WARNING at 30+ location pages (require 60%+ unique content)
- 🛑 HARD STOP at 50+ location pages (require justification)
- Generate valid XML output
- Split at 50k URLs with sitemap index
- Generate STRUCTURE.md documentation
Safe Programmatic Pages (OK at scale)
✅ Integration pages (with real setup docs) ✅ Template/tool pages (with downloadable content) ✅ Glossary pages (200+ word definitions) ✅ Product pages (unique specs, reviews) ✅ User profile pages (user-generated content)
Penalty Risk (avoid at scale)
❌ Location pages with only city name swapped ❌ "Best [tool] for [industry]" without industry-specific value ❌ "[Competitor] alternative" without real comparison data ❌ AI-generated pages without human review and unique value
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 105 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A d5c9155dd18d
seo-sitemap is a skill published in the GitHub repository 01clauding/claude-seo-skill (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 838 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to 30x-seo-sitemap, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-seo
Use when the user wants to audit a URL for AI citation eligibility, check why AI systems don't cite their pages, score AI Overview or citation worthiness, generate or validate an llms.txt file, rewrite content for AEO/GEO, extract named entities, or diff two page versions for SEO regressions. No API keys required.
gemini
Cross-model second opinion from Google Gemini — a different AI reviewing the same changes, with deep Google ecosystem knowledge. Three modes: review (pass/fail gate for Google Ads campaigns, SEO metadata, or code), challenge (adversarial stress-test that tries to break your changes), and consult (open Q&A with Gemini…
backlink-audit
Backlink / off-page SEO audit. Works WITHOUT a paid tool by default — it uses the Google Search Console Links report (your top linking sites, most-linked pages, and anchor text) plus any backlink export the user provides (Ahrefs / Semrush / Majestic / DataForSEO CSV). Analyzes referring-domain profile, anchor-text…
competitor-pages
Competitor page gap analysis — take a query you want to win and the pages currently outranking you, and produce a concrete brief on what to add or change to compete. Compares content depth and coverage (subtopics they cover that you don't), structure (headings, format, tables, media), search-intent match, E-E-A-T…
hreflang-international
International / multilingual SEO audit focused on hreflang correctness: missing or broken return tags, wrong language/region codes, missing x-default, self-referencing errors, hreflang vs canonical conflicts, and inconsistent signals across HTML head, HTTP headers and XML sitemap. Also reviews URL structure (ccTLD vs…
programmatic-seo
Programmatic SEO planning and audit: building or evaluating large sets of template-generated pages that target long-tail query patterns (e.g. "[service] in [city]", "[product] vs [product]", "[tool] for [use-case]"). Covers data-source and template design, thin/duplicate-content and doorway-page risks, per-page…