Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/0dayinc/pwn/reflectnpx skills add 0dayInc/pwn --skill reflectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0dayInc/pwnWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/0dayinc/pwn/reflect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0dayinc/pwn/reflect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0dayinc/pwn/reflect.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00642 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00321 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00128 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
pwn-ai-agent-reflect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PWN::AI::Agent::Reflect
PWN::AI::Agent::Reflect is the inward-facing counterpart to PWN::AI::Agent::Extrospection. Where Extrospection looks OUTWARD at the world the agent operates in (host state, toolchain, network, threat-intel), Reflect looks INWARD - it lets pwn hand a request to the active AI engine and reflect on its own artifacts, transcripts, findings, code, or decisions. This module is gated by PWN::Env[:ai][:module_reflection] so that potentially-sensitive local data is never shipped to a remote LLM unless the operator has explicitly opted in via pwn-vault / config. It is the single choke-point every PWN::AI::Agent::* domain agent (Assembly, BurpSuite, GQRX, HackerOne, SAST, VulnGen, ...) routes through when it wants an LLM opinion on locally-produced data, and it is also what PWN::AI::Agent::Learning.reflect uses to distill session transcripts into durable PWN::Memory lessons. TEACHER-STUDENT REFLECTION -------------------------- When PWN::Env[:ai][:reflect_engine] (or opts[:engine]) names a different provider than :active, Reflect.on temporarily flips :active for the duration of the introspection call. This lets a local Ollama model EXECUTE the task while a frontier model WRITES the durable lessons about it — the local model then reads back distilled reasoning it could never have produced itself. IMPLEMENTATION NOTE ------------------- Reflect.on MUST call the engine's text .chat API directly — never Loop.run. Nesting Loop.run re-enters TaskSummarizer/PromptBuilder/ auto_introspect and produces SystemStackError at the Pry after_read boundary whenever module_reflection is enabled. A thread-local depth counter still gates re-entrant Reflect.on (e.g. chat_for_plan inside an outer agent turn that also judges/reflects).
When to use
Call PWN::AI::Agent::Reflect from pwn_eval when the task needs this module.
Do not reimplement it in shell.
Methodologies
Generated from pwn/ai/agent/reflect.rb. Prefer the public class methods below.
Class methods take (opts = {}) and read opts.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 48 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A a0742e4b8ce0
pwn-ai-agent-reflect is a skill published in the GitHub repository 0dayInc/pwn (78 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 642 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
analyzing-linux-elf-malware
Analyze malicious Linux ELF binaries — botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure — through static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x8664 and ARM samples. Use when investigating Linux malware, triaging a suspicious ELF binary…
osmedeus-expert
Expert guide for the Osmedeus security automation workflow engine. Use when: (1) writing or editing YAML workflows (modules and flows), (2) running osmedeus CLI commands (scan, workflow management, installation, server), (3) configuring steps, runners, triggers, or template variables, (4) debugging workflow execution…
performing-jwt-none-algorithm-attack
Execute and test the JWT none algorithm attack to bypass signature verification by manipulating the alg header field in JSON Web Tokens.
performing-ai-assisted-vulnerability-discovery
Using LLMs to accelerate vulnerability research and pentest workflows — generating syntax-valid fuzzing seeds and evolving grammars, fine-tuned mutation dictionaries, parallel agent-based proof-of-vulnerability generation, and evidence-driven passive analysis of real HTTP traffic via the Burp MCP server. Covers…
supabase
Supabase / PostgREST Row-Level-Security playbook — pull the anon (or leaked servicerole) key out of the frontend JS, map tables from the auto-generated OpenAPI spec, test anonymous RLS READ disclosures (PII/secret leaks), and anonymous RLS WRITE abuse (insert/update/delete — e.g. forging…
graphql
GraphQL pentest playbook — find the endpoint, dump the schema (introspection or field-suggestion fallback), then test for authorization gaps, query batching, alias overload, depth-based DoS, and SQLi/NoSQLi in resolver arguments. Use when the target exposes a /graphql endpoint, GraphiQL, Apollo, or accepts GraphQL…