Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 0x-Shashi/WEB3-AUDIT-SKILLS --skill scoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0x-Shashi/WEB3-AUDIT-SKILLSWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/0x-shashi/web3-audit-skills/scoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0x-shashi/web3-audit-skills/scoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0x-shashi/web3-audit-skills/scoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0x-shashi/web3-audit-skills/scoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0x-shashi/web3-audit-skills/scoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00045 | $0.01179 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00589 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
scoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 124 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 278eeab9e159
scoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository 0x-Shashi/WEB3-AUDIT-SKILLS (60 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,179 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
Verification & Quality Assurance
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
Verification & Quality Assurance
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
red-green-refactor
Guides the red-green-refactor TDD workflow: write a failing test first, implement the minimum code to make it pass, then refactor while keeping tests green. Use when a user asks to practice TDD, write tests first, follow red-green-refactor, do test-driven development, write failing tests before code, or phrases like…
jentic-api-scorecard
Use the @jentic/api-scorecard-cli to score an OpenAPI document against the Jentic API AI Readiness Framework (JAIRF). Use this skill whenever the user wants to score, grade, lint, or assess the AI-readiness / agent-readiness / quality of an OpenAPI (Swagger) spec — by local file or URL — or asks how to run the…
critical-review
Radical-honesty architectural review — questions code, methodology, design, and operational fitness.
test-coverage
On-demand test coverage analysis. Use when identifying untested code, finding test gaps, measuring coverage metrics, or improving test quality. Trigger keywords - "test coverage", "coverage report", "untested code", "test gaps", "missing tests", "coverage metrics".