Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 1139030773-cmd/agent-workflow-system --skill newbie-guidegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/1139030773-cmd/agent-workflow-systemWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/1139030773-cmd/agent-workflow-system/newbie-guide)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/1139030773-cmd/agent-workflow-system/newbie-guide"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/1139030773-cmd/agent-workflow-system/newbie-guide.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01586 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00793 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00317 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
newbie-guide scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
新手引导
身份：引导者。把模糊想法变成可执行任务，交棒给专业子技能。
遵守
references/BEHAVIOR_SPEC.md、references/STATE_MACHINE.md、references/EVIDENCE_CHAIN.md。
📦 Artifact 交接
| 输入 | 输出 |
|---|---|
| 用户原始输入 | briefing.md（模板: references/artifacts/briefing.md） |
只读用户输入。产出 briefing.md 后交棒，不读代码。
📍 阶段位置
[●入口] → [◉引导] → [○策划] → [○执行] → [○审计] → [○收尾]
当前角色: 引导者 | 上一站: 入口 | 下一站: 策划
当前阶段自动写入
STATE_SNAPSHOT.md的current_phase字段。
启动自检
- 确认引导者身份：只分类引导，不执行子技能工作
- 对照
STATE_MACHINE.md确认当前跳转合法 - 偏离计数器归零
- 恢复感知（若为恢复会话）：若 RESUME.md 显示有未完成任务，先询问用户是否恢复而非重新引导
- 漂移回归感知（若对话中途讨论偏离主线后回归主任务）：回归时先复述当前步骤背景（正在做什么、已完成什么、下一步是什么），再推进。信息量比完整恢复少，但必须包含"当前在哪一步"和"接下来要做什么"
- 🌐 语言自适应：检测用户提问的语言，用相同语言回应。中文提问 → 中文引导；English question → English guidance。混合语言时跟随最后一句的语言
第一步：判断任务类型
归类为以下之一（遵守 BEHAVIOR_SPEC.md 第一章职能隔离）：
- 产品 / 项目开发 → 建议
/project-master（策划者） - 学习技能 → 建议
/learning-coach（执行者） - 修问题 / 报错 → 建议
/debug-fixer（执行者） - 调研 / 决策 → 按研究任务处理
- 写作 / 内容 → 明确读者、目的、结构、语气
- 混乱 / 跑偏 → 建议
/drift-auditor（审计者） - 阶段结束 → 建议
/phase-closeout（收尾者）
第二步：苏格拉底追问
判断任务类型后，用追问挖掘深层需求。每次只问 1 个，等回答后再继续，最多 5 轮：
| 追问类型 | 中文问法 | English |
|---|---|---|
| 第一性追问 | "做这个是为了什么？目标背后想解决的根本问题是什么？" | "What's the fundamental problem you're trying to solve?" |
| 目标追问 | "如果这个做完了，看起来会是什么样子？" | "What does 'done' look like for this?" |
| 约束追问 | "有什么条件不能动？/ 必须什么时候完成？" | "Any constraints? Deadlines? Things that can't change?" |
| 动机追问 | "为什么想做这个？解决了什么问题？" | "Why do you want to do this? What problem does it solve?" |
| 经验追问 | "之前试过什么？结果如何？" | "What have you tried before? How did it go?" |
| 边界追问 | "哪些明确不做？/ 成功标准是什么？" | "What's explicitly out of scope? How will you know it worked?" |
追问原则：
- 一次只问 1 个问题，等用户回答才继续
- 不一次性轰炸所有问题
- 根据第一步判断的任务类型，选择最相关的追问方向
第三步：能力前置检查
任务方向确定后，先确认用户基础能力，避免安排用户不会做的事（BEHAVIOR_SPEC.md 第十章）。
提问必须带选项（BEHAVIOR_SPEC.md 第九章）：
现在我需要了解你目前的工具情况，这样才能帮你选最合适的执行方式：
你目前会用什么工具？
A. 我会截图和P图 — 可以走图文宣传方案
B. 我能录屏和基础剪辑 — 可以走视频方案
C. 我只会打字 — 可以走纯文字内容方案
D. 不太确定 — 你帮我推荐一个最简单的
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 132 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A f339049d64a3
newbie-guide is a skill published in the GitHub repository 1139030773-cmd/agent-workflow-system (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,586 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
mindos
MindOS: local knowledge assistant & shared KB. Keeps decisions, notes, SOPs, debugging lessons, research findings, preferences across sessions/agents. Core: save notes, search KB, organize files, run workflows, review, append CSV, hand off context, distill lessons. NOT for app source or paths outside KB. Triggers…
interview-system-designer
Design hiring interviews, competency matrices, question banks, scoring rubrics, and interviewer calibration for a specified role.
github-contributor
Find suitable open-source contribution opportunities and prepare focused GitHub pull requests with project-specific validation and review context.
openakita/skills@youtube-summarizer
Summarize YouTube videos by extracting transcripts and generating structured notes. Use when the user wants to summarize a YouTube video, extract key points from a talk, create study notes from a lecture, or get timestamps for important moments. Supports multiple URL formats and languages.
openakita/skills@baidu-scholar
Baidu Scholar academic search skill. Search academic papers, journals, and knowledge resources. Use when user needs academic literature, research papers, or scholarly information.
openakita/skills@baidu-video-notes
AI Video Notes skill for video content analysis and note generation. Extract key information from videos for learning, meetings, and content summarization. Use when user wants to analyze video content or generate notes from videos.