What is review-model?

A design review process for checking a document against project requirements, architecture decisions, and SysML conventions. Architecture decisions are choices about a system's overall structure.

Use it to review design documents for requirement coverage, architectural consistency, and correct SysML style.

It can reveal disagreements, missing requirements, or departures from the project's modeling rules before they cause later problems.

How 1cFE/fusion-tea configures Claude Code

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to 1cFE/fusion-tea. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file

curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/1cFE/fusion-tea/main/.agents/skills/review-model/SKILL.md

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/1cFE/fusion-tea

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/1cfe/fusion-tea/review-model/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/1cfe/fusion-tea/review-model)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/1cfe/fusion-tea/review-model"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/1cfe/fusion-tea/review-model/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/1cfe/fusion-tea/review-model"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/1cfe/fusion-tea/review-model.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 18 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 646 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00018	$0.00646
Opus 5.5	$0.00007	$0.00258
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00004	$0.00129
Haiku 4.5	$0.00002	$0.00065

Measured 24d ago against content hash fe2c6210c5e0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-model scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/review-model/SKILL.md · 50 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 50 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Before executing this skill, read .agentic-mbse/claude.md in Claude Code or .agentic-mbse/codex.md in Codex. Resolve supporting paths from this skill’s installed directory; keep generated outputs in the project or a temporary directory. Read referenced skills from .agents/skills/<name>/SKILL.md when their guidance is needed.

Review Model

Use the assigned scope and “Review Brief and Context Limits” in modeling_project/MODELING_PROCESS.md. For a focused question, read only the supplied entry sections and primary evidence within the brief’s budget; return missing evidence before expanding. Apply the broader checks below only to claims in scope. Save a short finding in the existing work record or requested evidence path; a separate report is useful for a substantive assessment.

Independently challenge a design where an architectural or integration risk warrants it. Read the relevant requirements, design, and primary evidence within the assigned scope; a substantive review can use work/active/{WI-XXX}_{name}/review.md.

Run this critique when requested or triggered by the canonical process. Use a fresh non-author context without inherited author conversation. One reviewer owns the assessment and may consult a specialist for a concrete uncertainty.

Examine the Design's Meaning

Start with the intended outcome and supported use, then inspect the proposed design. Focus on consequential questions:

Do the physical structure, operating assumptions, and analysis describe the same system?
Are relevant quantities and interfaces owned consistently, including downstream effects?
Do the cited sources and chosen approximations support the intended use?
Would the proposed checks expose the likely failure, or only confirm the author's chosen representation?
Do calculations and bindings evaluate the supplied design rather than choose it? Where the design-choice row of the technical-pattern table in modeling_project/MODELING_PROCESS.md applies, check the actual bindings against design-choices.md.

Read the full file on GitHub · 50 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

24d ago Changed · -6 lines fe2c6210c5e0
1mo ago First seen · 56 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 6df99f846680

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-model is a skill published in the GitHub repository 1cFE/fusion-tea (5 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 646 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-29.

Code review

review-model next to 6 skills from other repositories
Mod	Type	Stars	Last push	Licence	Scan	Tokens	Works with
review-model1cFE/fusion-tea	Skill	5	24d ago	MIT	A	18	Claude Code
autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub	Skill	9.5k	yesterday	MIT	A	17	Claude Code, Codex
agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills	Skill	2.2k	6d ago	MIT	A	115	Claude Code, Codex
omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes	Skill	5.2k	yesterday	MIT	A	48	Claude Code, Codex
revdiff-planumputun/revdiff	Skill	945	yesterday	MIT	A	84	Claude Code
explore-unknownsdzhng/skills	Skill	1.4k	2d ago	MIT	A	162	Claude Code, Codex
re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin	Skill	1.4k	4d ago	MIT	A	70	Claude Code

fusion-tea: Skill for Claude Code