Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to 2233admin/design-pipeline. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/2233admin/design-pipeline/main/.agents/skills/bmad-code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/2233admin/design-pipelineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/2233admin/design-pipeline/bmad-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00917 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00458 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00183 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to bmad-code-review — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review Workflow
Goal: Review code changes adversarially. No noise, no filler.
Subagents, when the capability is available, are an important part of this workflow. Use them as directed by the workflow steps. If you need an explicit user instruction to run them, ask once now for the whole workflow run.
Conventions
- Bare paths (e.g.
checklist.md) resolve from the skill root. {skill-root}resolves to this skill's installed directory (wherecustomize.tomllives).{project-root}-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.{skill-name}resolves to the skill directory's basename.
On Activation
Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block
Run: uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow
If the script fails, resolve the workflow block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:
{skill-root}/customize.toml— defaults{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml— team overrides{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml— personal overrides
Any missing file is skipped. Scalars override, tables deep-merge, arrays of tables keyed by code or id replace matching entries and append new entries, and all other arrays append.
Step 2: Execute Prepend Steps
Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_prepend} in order before proceeding.
Step 3: Load Persistent Facts
Treat every entry in {workflow.persistent_facts} as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run. Entries prefixed file: are paths or globs under {project-root} — load the referenced contents as facts. All other entries are facts verbatim.
Step 4: Load Config
Load config from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and resolve:
project_name,planning_artifacts,implementation_artifacts,user_namecommunication_language,document_output_language,user_skill_leveldateas system-generated current datetimesprint_status={implementation_artifacts}/sprint-status.yamlproject_context=**/project-context.md(load if exists)- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config
{communication_language}
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 91 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 1ba6481b28c7
bmad-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository 2233admin/design-pipeline (9 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 917 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to bmad-code-review, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ss-lint
Quick automated lint — detects common design system violations in seconds.
ss-learn
Capture a human-approved UI design lesson as a privacy-minimized local StyleSeed candidate, review it, and prepare an opt-in share package without transmitting project code, prompts, screenshots, or brand data. Use when a person asks StyleSeed to remember, learn from, generalize, review, or prepare a reusable rule…
ss-review
Review UI code for design system compliance, accessibility, and best practices.
component-api-validator
Audit component APIs for consistency, breaking changes, TypeScript coverage, and contract compliance across a component library. Trigger when someone says: component prop review, verify component types are exported, component API audit, check our component interfaces, are our props consistent, API consistency check…
pr-review
Review one or all open pull requests in saadeghi/daisyui with read-only GitHub data and isolated base-versus-PR checks. Use when Codex must verify a PR, find concrete regressions, decide whether it is safe to merge, and write a concise report under tmp/pr/.
ss-studio
Turn a product brief and optional references into three distinct creative directions, a human-selected StyleSeed interaction plan, generated image/video asset jobs, a working UI prototype, and a verified prototype-first showcase reel. Use for client concepts, app interaction exploration, trendy but coherent UI…