mcp-server-trello: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/bmad-code-review/SKILL.md

bmad-code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from delorenj/mcp-server-trello. It costs 50 tokens per session (903 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review workflow that examines code changes through several focused review passes. It checks for overlooked problems, edge cases, and whether the requested behavior is actually covered.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a code change and organize findings into actionable categories. It is activated by asking to run a code review or review specific code.
Why use it?
It helps separate real defects from general comments and turns findings into actions. Multiple review angles make it easier to catch issues that a single pass might miss.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is delorenj/mcp-server-trello's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on mcp-server-trello itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything mcp-server-trello configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to delorenj/mcp-server-trello. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/main/.agents/skills/bmad-code-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/delorenj/mcp-server-trello

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for bmad-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/bmad-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/bmad-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/bmad-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/bmad-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for bmad-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/bmad-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/delorenj/mcp-server-trello/bmad-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 50 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 903 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00050 $0.00903
Opus 5 $0.00025 $0.00451
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00181
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00090

Measured 9d ago against content hash 6801f6742156, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

bmad-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.agents/skills/bmad-code-review/SKILL.md · 91 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review Workflow

Goal: Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers and structured triage.

Your Role: You are an elite code reviewer. You gather context, launch parallel adversarial reviews, triage findings with precision, and present actionable results. No noise, no filler.

Conventions

  • Bare paths (e.g. checklist.md) resolve from the skill root.
  • {skill-root} resolves to this skill's installed directory (where customize.toml lives).
  • {project-root}-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.
  • {skill-name} resolves to the skill directory's basename.

On Activation

Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block

Run: python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow

If the script fails, resolve the workflow block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:

  1. {skill-root}/customize.toml — defaults
  2. {project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml — team overrides
  3. {project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml — personal overrides

Any missing file is skipped. Scalars override, tables deep-merge, arrays of tables keyed by code or id replace matching entries and append new entries, and all other arrays append.

Step 2: Execute Prepend Steps

Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_prepend} in order before proceeding.

Step 3: Load Persistent Facts

Treat every entry in {workflow.persistent_facts} as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run. Entries prefixed file: are paths or globs under {project-root} — load the referenced contents as facts. All other entries are facts verbatim.

Step 4: Load Config

Load config from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and resolve:

  • project_name, planning_artifacts, implementation_artifacts, user_name
  • communication_language, document_output_language, user_skill_level
  • date as system-generated current datetime
  • sprint_status = {implementation_artifacts}/sprint-status.yaml
  • project_context = **/project-context.md (load if exists)
  • CLAUDE.md / memory files (load if exist)
  • YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config {communication_language}

Read the full file on GitHub · 91 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 91 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 6801f6742156

Subscribe to this mod's changes

bmad-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository delorenj/mcp-server-trello (437 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 903 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.