Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 26zl/cybersec-toolkit --skill building-soc-playbook-for-ransomwaregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/26zl/cybersec-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/26zl/cybersec-toolkit/building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/26zl/cybersec-toolkit/building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/26zl/cybersec-toolkit/building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/26zl/cybersec-toolkit/building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/26zl/cybersec-toolkit/building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 131 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 131 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
- medium Data Exfiltration · line 142 Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.02827 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01413 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00565 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00283 |
Grade A, and why
building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -X POST "https://api.crowdstrike.com/devices/entities/devices-actions/v2?action_name=contain" \ Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware — 95% identical, 40 lines differ
- building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware — 89% identical, 22 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 288 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Building SOC Playbook for Ransomware
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- SOC teams need a standardized ransomware response playbook for Tier 1-3 analysts
- An organization lacks documented procedures for ransomware containment and recovery
- Tabletop exercises reveal gaps in ransomware response coordination
- Compliance requirements (NIST CSF, ISO 27001) mandate documented incident playbooks
Do not use during an active ransomware incident as the sole guide — have pre-built playbooks tested and rehearsed before incidents occur.
Prerequisites
- SIEM platform (Splunk ES, Elastic Security, or Sentinel) with endpoint and network data
- EDR solution (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Microsoft Defender for Endpoint) with network isolation capability
- Backup infrastructure with tested recovery procedures and offline/immutable backups
- Communication plan with legal, executive leadership, and external IR retainer contacts
- MITRE ATT&CK knowledge for ransomware technique chains
Workflow
Step 1: Define Detection Triggers
Create SIEM detection rules for early ransomware indicators:
Mass File Encryption Detection (Splunk):
index=sysmon EventCode=11
| bin _time span=1m
| stats dc(TargetFilename) AS unique_files, values(TargetFilename) AS sample_files by Computer, Image, _time
| where unique_files > 100
| eval suspicious_extensions = if(match(mvjoin(sample_files, ","), "\.(encrypted|locked|crypt|enc|ransom)"), "YES", "NO")
| where suspicious_extensions="YES" OR unique_files > 500
| sort - unique_files
Shadow Copy Deletion (T1490):
index=wineventlog sourcetype="WinEventLog:Security" OR index=sysmon EventCode=1
(CommandLine="*vssadmin*delete*shadows*" OR CommandLine="*wmic*shadowcopy*delete*"
OR CommandLine="*bcdedit*/set*recoveryenabled*no*" OR CommandLine="*wbadmin*delete*catalog*")
| table _time, Computer, User, ParentImage, Image, CommandLine
Ransomware Note File Creation:
index=sysmon EventCode=11
TargetFilename IN ("*README*.txt", "*DECRYPT*.txt", "*RANSOM*.txt", "*RECOVER*.html", "*HOW_TO*.txt")
| stats count by Computer, Image, TargetFilename
| where count > 5
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 288 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 42c8cba41c79
building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware is a skill published in the GitHub repository 26zl/cybersec-toolkit (54 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 2,827 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware
Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and…
building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware
Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and…
building-soc-playbook-for-ransomware
Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and…
incident-response-expert
Expert in security incident response, NIST framework, digital forensics, containment strategies, and recovery procedures. Use when the user mentions forensics, NIST, containment, recovery, or cybersecurity, or when the task involves NIST Incident Response Lifecycle, Incident Classification, Incident Response Workflow…
building-ransomware-playbook-with-cisa-framework
Builds a structured ransomware incident response playbook aligned with the CISA StopRansomware Guide and NIST Cybersecurity Framework, covering preparation, detection, containment, eradication, recovery, and post-incident phases with actionable checklists. Use when creating or updating a ransomware playbook, running a…
analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples
Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master Boot Record (MBR), Volume Boot Record (VBR), or UEFI firmware for below-OS persistence, covering boot sector analysis, UEFI module inspection, and anti-rootkit detection. Use when compromise survives OS reinstallation or antivirus/EDR fails to detect…