Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to 2SSK/dot-files. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/2SSK/dot-files/main/.claude/skills/ship/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/2SSK/dot-filesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/2ssk/dot-files/ship)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/2ssk/dot-files/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/2ssk/dot-files/ship/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/2ssk/dot-files/ship"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/2ssk/dot-files/ship.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.00818 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00327 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00164 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
ship scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ship
Commits staged changes, pushes the branch, opens a PR, and triggers an automated opencode review.
When to Use This Skill
Invoke this skill when the user says things like:
- "ship it"
- "commit push pr"
- "ship this"
- "create a pr"
- "push and open a pr"
- "commit and ship"
Workflow
Follow these steps in order, stopping and reporting any errors immediately.
Step 1 — Sanity checks
Run these in parallel:
git status
git diff
git log --oneline -5
git remote -v
Use the output to understand: what branch we're on, what's changed, what the recent commit style looks like, and what the remote is.
Step 2 — Fetch and rebase
git fetch origin
git rebase origin/main
If there are conflicts, resolve them (keeping both sides where appropriate), then continue the rebase. Do NOT skip this step.
Step 3 — Stage files
Stage all changed/new files that are relevant to the work. Explicitly exclude:
.DS_Store*.db,*.db-shm,*.db-wal- Any file that looks like it contains secrets (
.env,credentials.*, etc.) - Prototype/demo directories unless they are part of the deliverable
git add <relevant files>
git status # verify staging looks right
Step 4 — Commit
Write a commit message that:
- Uses the imperative mood (
feat:,fix:,ci:,docs:,refactor:) - First line ≤ 72 characters summarising the why, not the what
- Body bullet points for non-obvious details (optional but preferred for large changes)
- Matches the style of recent commits in
git log
git commit -m "<message>"
Step 5 — Push
If the branch has no upstream yet:
git push -u origin <branch>
Otherwise:
git push
Step 6 — Open PR
Use the gh CLI to create a PR targeting main:
gh pr create \
--title "<concise title matching commit subject>" \
--body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-4 bullet points describing what changed and why>
## Notes
<any reviewer context, migration steps, known limitations — omit section if none>
EOF
)" \
--base main
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago First seen · 133 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 1ab4a626d963
ship is a skill published in the GitHub repository 2SSK/dot-files (250 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 818 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
git-pr-workflows-git-workflow
Guide changes through code checks, testing, commits, and pull request preparation. Use when coordinating a complete Git workflow and verifying readiness for collaboration.
hero-diff-highlight
A dark code editor reveals a red deletion then a green addition with a soft pulse. Function: PR / code-change explainer.
lean-review
CocoLean diff-scoped over-engineering audit — scans uncommitted git diff and applies five classification tags (delete/stdlib/native/yagni/shrink) to identify unnecessary surface area before commit.
review-gate
Use before an agent-produced diff is committed, pushed, opened as a PR, merged, landed, or applied to user files when explicit implementation approval is missing. Trigger for review gate, review pack, approve before landing, diff first then land, human approval, merge gate, commit gate, push gate, or PR readiness.…