Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 6ixGODD/mine --skill mine-plan-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/6ixGODD/mineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/6ixgodd/mine/mine-plan-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/6ixgodd/mine/mine-plan-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/6ixgodd/mine/mine-plan-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/6ixgodd/mine/mine-plan-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/6ixgodd/mine/mine-plan-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.02378 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00951 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00476 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00238 |
Grade A, and why
mine-plan-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 190 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MINE Plan Review
Independently verify actual behavior against the immutable Plan and accepted Design. Bring narrow, unambiguous defects to a verified mergeable result; independence does not require another compensation cycle for a small fully verifiable correction. Do not accept from an implementation report, green label or tests alone.
Mode, identity and real authority
The exact invocation "complete release closure" selects release mode, not a Plan path. Otherwise resolve one exact graph ID/path or canonical aliases planNN / PNN / NN, including numeric hierarchy and terminal -C01, against Root graph show JSON. Strip one invocation @; require one distinct match and use only the exact stored ID. Do not guess a path, incomplete C ordinal, latest compensation or another READY node.
Resolve Root from Git inventory; read AGENTS.md, requirements, Root .mine/config.toml/ marker, complete Plan, governing leaves, predecessor acceptance evidence, implementation commits/report and registered primary sources. Fresh .mine/design/ and .mine/plan/ are defaults, not authority over another configured source. Graph reads/writes use Root, never a linked checkout's copy. Check installed help/JSON/MCP schema first; future candidate features must not govern a live older workspace.
Prefer available MCP reads/transitions with their actual required actor/observer/ operation inputs; use JSON CLI for prepare, operations, verification, clarification, rewire/release and scanner where no tool exists. Never invent tools or hand-edit graph.
For review prepare, use own explicit actor, one retained operation UUID and caller revision: plan prepare --id --actor --expected-revision --operation-id --format json. Enter the returned registered linked checkout only after completed checkpoint. Verify actual branch/tip and stored anchor ancestry; do not create a second checkout or switch Root.
Independent evidence and economical checks
Obtain the actual executor stop/handoff for exact owner/run and checkout/output. Silence, timeout, IMPLEMENTED or clean status is not proof the writer stopped. Keep complete held-owner/wave facts: IMPLEMENTED and pending positive review retain ownership until verified integration/cleanup/checkpoint completion. Invalid policy does not remove a held owner or grant conservative fallback.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago Changed · -183 lines 8adb1779ecb4
- 2mo ago Changed · +6 lines c2dbd44a4e20
- 2mo ago First seen · 367 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A fd6e8861c681
mine-plan-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository 6ixGODD/mine (16 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 2,378 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
mine-plan-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mine-plan-review6ixGODD/mine | Skill | 16 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 100 | Claude Code |
| pr-reviewdannote/dot-pi | Skill | 57 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 79 | Claude Code, Codex |
| refactorsmallnest/goal-workflow | Skill | 299 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 71 | Claude Code |
| maintainer-replydannote/dot-pi | Skill | 57 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 65 | Claude Code, Codex |
| walkthroughsmallnest/goal-workflow | Skill | 299 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 131 | Claude Code |
| understandsmallnest/goal-workflow | Skill | 299 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 125 | Claude Code |
| smellsmallnest/goal-workflow | Skill | 299 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 97 | Claude Code |