A skill for critically reviewing GitHub pull requests, which are proposed code changes submitted for discussion and approval. It supports first reviews, follow-up reviews, checking feedback, and assessing merge readiness.

Finding defects, verifying requested changes, evaluating automated checks, drafting review comments, and deciding whether a pull request is ready to merge.

It provides a structured way to judge code changes against the repository's own rules, discussion, tests, and checks.

pr-review — Skill for Claude Code and Codex by dannote/dot-pi

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add dannote/dot-pi --skill pr-review

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dannote/dot-pi

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dannote/dot-pi/pr-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dannote/dot-pi/pr-review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dannote/dot-pi/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dannote/dot-pi/pr-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dannote/dot-pi/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dannote/dot-pi/pr-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 79 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 1,746 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits

NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026

How audits are shown

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00079	$0.01746
Opus 5.5	$0.00032	$0.00698
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00016	$0.00349
Haiku 4.5	$0.00008	$0.00175

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 53a15d0117cb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

web-content-audit — 86% identical, 272 lines differ

skills/pr-review/SKILL.md · 97 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Pull Request Review

Review before mutating. Read the repository's AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, PR template, and relevant bot instructions before judging the change. Treat those files as the project's source of truth; do not import conventions from another repository.

Choose the workflow

Context	Role	Output
First review	Reviewer	Evidence-based findings and one recommendation
Re-review after feedback	Follow-up reviewer	Status of each requested change plus regression findings
Merged or closed PR	Auditor	Retrospective findings and any separate follow-up action
CodeRabbit, Copilot, or contributor review	Maintainer	Independently verified classifications
CI and checks	Reviewer	Attributed pass, PR failure, infrastructure failure, flake, skip, or unknown
Preparing comments	Maintainer reviewer	Exact concise inline-comment draft
Approved fix or merge	Maintainer/implementer	Scoped action and validation result

First review: inspect the final diff, history, discussion, checks, and relevant source/tests.
Re-review: compare the reviewed commit SHA with the current head before classifying anything. Build the requested-change list from maintainer reviews, inline threads, author responses, and later commits. Mark each item as maintainer-requested, external suggestion, or newly discovered, then classify it as addressed, partial, unresolved, or obsolete from the current diff. If no commits or relevant changes followed the review, say so directly; do not infer fixes from the PR body or commit message.
Merged or closed PR: review retrospectively. Do not recommend merging, approving, or requesting changes; identify only lessons or a separate follow-up warranted by current code.
External review: verify each CodeRabbit, Copilot, or contributor finding against the current head, current PR body, current conversation, and repository policy; classify it as valid, invalid, stale, duplicate, or low-value. A bot threshold is not a project requirement unless repository guidance or CI makes it one; do not add comments or code solely to satisfy an unsupported metric.
CI and checks: inspect failing logs, not only check summaries. Attribute each relevant result as passing, failing because of the PR, infrastructure failure, flaky, cancelled/blocked, skipped/not applicable, or unverified. Report the actual checks; do not inflate the count with service statuses or infer checks that are not present.
Draft comments: map valid findings to the smallest useful line range, prefer inline comments, remove duplicates, and show the exact draft.
Fix or merge: only act after the user explicitly chooses that action. Use vibe-merge when reimplementing selected ideas instead of merging a PR wholesale.

Read the full file on GitHub · 97 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

2mo ago First seen · 97 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 53a15d0117cb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

pr-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository dannote/dot-pi (57 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 1,746 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Code review agent-skills ast-grep coding-agent extensions skills web-search

pr-review next to 6 skills from other repositories
Mod	Type	Stars	Last push	Licence	Scan	Tokens	Works with
pr-reviewdannote/dot-pi	Skill	57	2d ago	MIT	A	79	Claude Code, Codex
mine-plan-review6ixGODD/mine	Skill	16	4d ago	MIT	A	100	Claude Code
regression-preventionmatt-bat/agent-command-center	Skill	4	2mo ago	none	A	75	Claude Code, Codex
multi-agent-security-reviewPSPDFKit-labs/pi-skills	Skill	17	5mo ago	none	A	45	Claude Code, Codex
multi-reviewPSPDFKit-labs/pi-skills	Skill	17	5mo ago	none	A	24	Claude Code, Codex
gh-address-commentsPSPDFKit-labs/pi-skills	Skill	17	5mo ago	none	A	39	Claude Code, Codex
agent-watchdogBuilderIO/skills	Skill	4.6k	4d ago	MIT	A	115	Claude Code, Codex