Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 777genius/plugin-kit-ai --skill review-checklistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/777genius/plugin-kit-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/777genius/plugin-kit-ai/review-checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/777genius/plugin-kit-ai/review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/777genius/plugin-kit-ai/review-checklist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/777genius/plugin-kit-ai/review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/777genius/plugin-kit-ai/review-checklist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00242 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00097 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
review-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to review-checklist — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
review-checklist
Claude generate for
skills/review-checklist/SKILL.md. Edit the canonical source, then re-runplugin-kit-ai skills generate.
Summary
Apply a short, consistent review checklist before merging changes.
Compatibility
- Requires a repository checkout
- Works best when the agent can inspect diffs and the touched files locally.
Canonical instructions
Review Checklist
What it does
Provides a repeatable review checklist for code, docs, and generated artifact changes before handoff or merge.
When to use
Use this when you want a quick review pass before merging or handing work off to another maintainer.
How to run
Read the checklist, inspect the changed files, and record concrete findings or the absence of findings.
Recommended checklist:
- Check whether authored
SKILL.mdand generated artifacts drifted. - Check whether validation or generate behavior changed unexpectedly.
- Check whether docs still describe the real authored contract.
- Check whether new failures are tied to exact files or behaviors.
Constraints
- This skill is instructional only and has no command to execute.
- Keep findings concrete and tied to changed files or behaviors.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 96dc91181951
review-checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository 777genius/plugin-kit-ai (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 242 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review-checklist, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
adk-go-self-review
Review an ADK Go change the way a maintainer will — a fresh-context pass over the whole diff, five lenses (correctness and tests, scope, simplicity, style, adk-python parity), and the mutation check that proves your tests pin the change. Use before opening a PR, before any later push that changes code, and when asked…
verify-change
A change-checking skill that reviews code differences and checks whether related documentation, tests, and records were updated.
verify-quality
A code-quality checker that measures complexity, size, naming, and common code smells. It reports problems such as duplicated code, unused code, and overly long functions.
verify-module
A module-checking skill that scans a project’s folders, code, and documentation. It expects each module to include a README.md and DESIGN.md, which explain how the module is used and why it was designed that way.
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review, two modes. Strategic Matrix v4.3 (MTA-004) for arguments/plans/decisions: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Summary. Deliverable Audit for built artefacts (assignments, reports, code outputs): isolated fresh-context hunt against the brief…
decision-journal
Unified decision lifecycle: Pre-decision logging, post-decision review, failure classification, and calibration tracking. Absorbs: post-mortem-engine.