Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/777genius/plugin-kit-ai/review-checklistnpx skills add 777genius/plugin-kit-ai --skill review-checklistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/777genius/plugin-kit-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/777genius/plugin-kit-ai/review-checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/777genius/plugin-kit-ai/review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/777genius/plugin-kit-ai/review-checklist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00242 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00121 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
review-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to review-checklist — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
review-checklist
Claude generate for
skills/review-checklist/SKILL.md. Edit the canonical source, then re-runplugin-kit-ai skills generate.
Summary
Apply a short, consistent review checklist before merging changes.
Compatibility
- Requires a repository checkout
- Works best when the agent can inspect diffs and the touched files locally.
Canonical instructions
Review Checklist
What it does
Provides a repeatable review checklist for code, docs, and generated artifact changes before handoff or merge.
When to use
Use this when you want a quick review pass before merging or handing work off to another maintainer.
How to run
Read the checklist, inspect the changed files, and record concrete findings or the absence of findings.
Recommended checklist:
- Check whether authored
SKILL.mdand generated artifacts drifted. - Check whether validation or generate behavior changed unexpectedly.
- Check whether docs still describe the real authored contract.
- Check whether new failures are tied to exact files or behaviors.
Constraints
- This skill is instructional only and has no command to execute.
- Keep findings concrete and tied to changed files or behaviors.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 39 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 96dc91181951
review-checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository 777genius/plugin-kit-ai (10 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 242 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review-checklist, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify-change
变更校验关卡。分析代码变更，检测文档同步状态，评估变更影响范围。当用户提到变更检查、文档同步、代码审查、提交前检查、diff分析时使用。在设计级变更、重构完成时自动触发。.
verify-module
模块完整性校验关卡。扫描目录结构、检测缺失文档、验证代码与文档同步。当用户提到模块校验、文档检查、结构完整性、README检查、DESIGN检查时使用。在新建模块完成时自动触发。.
verify-quality
代码质量校验关卡。检测复杂度、重复代码、命名规范、函数长度等质量指标。当用户提到代码质量、复杂度检查、代码异味、重构建议、lint检查、代码规范时使用。在复杂模块、重构完成时自动触发。.
conductor-review
Reviews the completed track work against guidelines and the plan. Acts as a Principal Software Engineer to ensure quality and compliance.
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review: v4.3 Strategic Matrix (MTA-004). 7-phase framework: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA Decision Engine → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Executive Summary. Absorbs: bias-detector.
decision-journal
Unified decision lifecycle: Pre-decision logging, post-decision review, failure classification, and calibration tracking. Absorbs: post-mortem-engine.