Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 777genius/universal-agent-plugins --skill review-checklistgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/777genius/universal-agent-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/777genius/universal-agent-plugins/review-checklist)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/777genius/universal-agent-plugins/review-checklist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/777genius/universal-agent-plugins/review-checklist.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00242 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00121 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
review-checklist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- review-checklist — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
review-checklist
Claude generate for
skills/review-checklist/SKILL.md. Edit the canonical source, then re-runplugin-kit-ai skills generate.
Summary
Apply a short, consistent review checklist before merging changes.
Compatibility
- Requires a repository checkout
- Works best when the agent can inspect diffs and the touched files locally.
Canonical instructions
Review Checklist
What it does
Provides a repeatable review checklist for code, docs, and generated artifact changes before handoff or merge.
When to use
Use this when you want a quick review pass before merging or handing work off to another maintainer.
How to run
Read the checklist, inspect the changed files, and record concrete findings or the absence of findings.
Recommended checklist:
- Check whether authored
SKILL.mdand generated artifacts drifted. - Check whether validation or generate behavior changed unexpectedly.
- Check whether docs still describe the real authored contract.
- Check whether new failures are tied to exact files or behaviors.
Constraints
- This skill is instructional only and has no command to execute.
- Keep findings concrete and tied to changed files or behaviors.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 39 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 96dc91181951
review-checklist is a skill published in the GitHub repository 777genius/universal-agent-plugins (11 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 242 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-and-quality
Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production, security-sensitive logic, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now…
code-simplification
Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.
chinese-code-review
A Chinese-language code-review communication guide with templates and severity levels for review comments.
receiving-code-review
A guide for handling code-review feedback carefully. Code review is the process of checking proposed changes before they are accepted into a project.
requesting-code-review
A code-review procedure for checking completed work against its requirements before it spreads or is merged. A code reviewer is a person or agent who looks for defects and missing parts.